INTERESTING READING REGARDING THE COMMERCIALS OPINION ON THE VALUE OF TAGGING SNAPPER!

I will be interested to hear what the opinions of our site members are on the follwing article which was posted in the May-June addition of the ProWest mag!

I personally have never had an issue releasing snapper and that goes for depths up to 90+m.

 

 

IN the May-June edition of ProWest,
we spoke about the Minister’s Position
Paper which recommended a suite
of new arrangements to manage the
recreational sector’s take of demersal
scalefish on the west coast such as
dhufish, snapper and baldchin groper.
One of those recommendations was to
increase the size limit of pink snapper
from 41cm to 50cm from south of
Kalbarri to east of Augusta for both the
recreational and commercial sectors.
In the weeks following, WAFIC met
with both the WA Demersal Gillnet and
Longline Association, which represents
fishermen from the temperate shark
fisheries, and permit holders from
the West Coast Demersal Scalefish
(Wetline) Fishery primarily on the
proposed increased size limit for pink
snapper.
Advice from the wetline sector,
particularly those who work in the
more northern part of the west coast,
was that they were strongly opposed
to a 50cm size limit. Their views were
that the issues of post release mortality
associated with snapper caught at depth
and released have not been properly
dealt with and too much weight had
been given to the incomplete and
inconclusive data from ANSA’s tagging
study.
Advice also received from the Fisheries
Research Division indicated that an
increased size limit for snapper is not
an appropriate tool for the commercial
sector given the post-release mortality
issues associated with releasing snapper
caught from depths greater than 30m,
but particularly above 90m. This is a
major factor considering that the vast
majority of snapper caught by wetliners
are caught deeper than 60m.
Another significant factor is that the
vast majority of snapper caught by the
wetline fishery are between 41-50cm in
the Midwest and Kalbarri zones.
WAFIC assistant executive officer,
Felicity Horn, who was present recently
when wetliners were unloading at
Dongara, said a large percentage of their
total catch was snapper and most of
those snapper were under 50cm.
‘A 50cm size limit would mean a
substantial proportion of the total catch
would need to be thrown back and then
would potentially not survive,’ Ms Horn
said.
The West Coast and Joint Authority
Southern Demersal Gillnet and
Demersal Longline Fisheries catch
approximately 5 per cent of the total
snapper catch, most of which is above
50cm.
The Minister’s Position Paper also
proposed that a four month seasonal
closure over summer also apply to
the recreational sector. In preparing
responses to the Minister, both the
temperate shark fishers and wetliners
also considered what the impacts would
be if the seasonal closure were to apply
to them.
It is evident there has been widespread
confusion amongst recreational
fishers on what the prime purpose
of the closure is, whether it is to
reduce recreational catch and effort or
provide spawning protection or both.
Some within the recreational sector
consider that if a four month closure
is to apply then it should be applied
to both sectors. This highlights the
lack of knowledge by some within
the recreational sector of the stringent
measures that are either in place or
coming into place in these commercial
fisheries to manage their catch of
demersal scalefish within recommended
levels.
LATE NEWS
In late June the Minister announced, as
part of changes to recreational fishing
off the west coast, that an increased pink
snapper size limit, from 41cm to 45cm
in October 2008 and then from 45cm to
50cm in 2010, will apply for the metro
and south-west zones only. It will apply to
commercial and recreational fishers. For
further information, please contact Felicity
Horn on 9492 8829.

 

With this message


luke's picture

Posts: 3163

Date Joined: 14/08/06

good read matt! seems they

Mon, 2008-10-13 10:04

good read matt! seems they want to keep whatever they pull up...regardless of size... " because they dont survive".......and becaus "most the snapper they catch are under 50cm".... obvious fix here...close the fishing for a while..let the sizes increase.....

Posts: 370

Date Joined: 11/08/05

http://www.recfishwest.org.au

Mon, 2008-10-13 10:11

http://www.recfishwest.org.au/TaggingProgram.htm#PreliminaryResults

Quote:
Tag 17525 - Pink Snapper (Nicknamed Yo-Yo) Originally released by the Simple method in March 2003 in 80 metres. Since being tagged this fish has been recaptured 5 times in the same area and each time it has been released by the simple method, with depth recordings of between 80 and 86 metres.

Nah, releasing snapper doesnt work.......

http://www.recfishwest.org.au/SubDemersalFishingFMP228.htm#Rec3

Quote:
Proposed Recommendation 3. Size limit for pink snapper increased from 41 to 50 cm south of Kalbarri to Augusta

Supported for entire West Coast bioregion - ......

Recfishwest recognizes that the recreational take of pink snapper is not the major sustainability concern in the West Coast bioregion and the various management proposals will further significantly reduce the recreational take of this species. We support this proposal in the belief that there will be a longer term benefit in catch quality for the sector.

The proposal to exclude the Kalbarri zone has not been discussed with recreational fishers. Recfishwest has been requesting research into the southern component of the oceanic stock around Kalbarri for many years without success. There have been significant concerns expressed about the commercial over-exploitation of the oceanic pink snapper stocks and the impact of this on the southern parts of the fishery has not been explored.

TerryF
=====
Beavering away in the background.......

luke's picture

Posts: 3163

Date Joined: 14/08/06

nah...pinkies dont survived

Mon, 2008-10-13 10:14

nah...pinkies dont survived terry...lol

 

good post, and agree wholeheartedly with the above post!!!

Dreamweaver's picture

Posts: 4561

Date Joined: 01/12/07

Good read Matt!

Mon, 2008-10-13 10:43

Thanks for posting that article - made for an intersting read. As I read it, they don't wan't the 'bother' of returning their snapper catch properly.

As you said and on Terry's comments - it would seem there isn't a problem withreturning snapper. 

Colin Molloy

(Colin 2 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

 

luke's picture

Posts: 3163

Date Joined: 14/08/06

lol.... to think a pro boat

Mon, 2008-10-13 10:51

lol.... to think a pro boat would take the time to return fish properly is a joke in itself...to much time and effort.....good job the pinky's are tough little bugga's!!!

Dreamweaver's picture

Posts: 4561

Date Joined: 01/12/07

Yup Luke

Mon, 2008-10-13 11:02

It aint gonna happen ay? 

Colin Molloy

(Colin 2 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

 

hlokk's picture

Posts: 524

Date Joined: 04/04/08

"

Mon, 2008-10-13 11:12

"
Some within the recreational sector
consider that if a four month closure
is to apply then it should be applied
to both sectors. This highlights the
lack of knowledge
by some within
the recreational sector of the stringent
measures that are either in place or
coming into place in these commercial
fisheries to manage their catch of
demersal scalefish within recommended
levels."

Considering the commercial catches for pink snapper make up 79% percent (recs only 11%), I think we can tell which side wrote this Foot in mouth

 

--------------

Always interested in someone to go fishing with

Posts: 370

Date Joined: 11/08/05

Some commercial fishermen are thinkers and doers

Mon, 2008-10-13 12:05

Pages 17-18 http://www.recfishwest.org.au/DhufishWorkshop2004.htm shows that some commercial fishermen who are in it for the long haul have their concerns too.

They recognise that sustainable fishing is essential for their future and try to do the right thing.

2.1 Commercial Fisher Perspective by W. Aitchison, Commercial Wetline Operator, Western Australia at the Western Australian Dhufish Workshop June 2004

Quote:
I started fishing in Bass Strait and then moved to Port Phillip Bay, where there were a huge number of recreational fishers and very few commercial fishers, yet it was the commercial fishers who were demonized for all the problems, such as lack of fish. I was advised to leave by a friend in the Fisheries Department before I was starved out by legislation.

I then moved to Western Australia and started wetline fishing from Geraldton for a short while before moving to Dongara where I have been fishing for about 14 years. I made a decision about three years ago to leave spawning dhufish alone and started fishing in water 350 metres deep and deeper from Perth. It was a vain hope as three other boats moved in and took up the slack.

The efficiency of fishers has increased so much and not just the commercial sector. For example, when I went to Dongara we would just steam out and start griding, three miles out, one mile down, three miles out, one mile down and so on, until we found a lump to fish. In a three to four day trip we would find between three to five lumps and of these, we would catch 200 to 500kg of dhufish. Now with Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and computers I can now do 20 lumps in a day with far less fish being caught.

Catch and effort returns are very deceptive for researchers, I am a classic example. The efficiency of GPS and computers means I go from spot to spot and spend very little time looking with very little time wasted. I used to employ one crewmember, but I purchased two DNG (Icelandic) fishing machines, which can do everything I can do, only better. They don’t get tired or grumpy, they just keep working (most wetliners have similar hydraulic reels now).

My fishing trips are now usually three days long where once they were five days long. On a side note, when we used to hand crank, the first day we were keen and usually did well, day two not so keen and usually did well and day three not keen at all and a bit slow, day four, grumpy, tired and very slow and by day five, not worth the effort! Now the machines do most of the work so I don’t get as tired yet when the researchers look at my catch returns they say the catch is staying the same, but they don’t see the huge increase in efficiency and effort.

All fishers have access to such electronics. I’m not saying that recreational fishers will be buying fishing machines but GPS and top of the line echo sounders are now being installed on most recreational fishing boats. The electronic guys are now targeting their sales at the recreational sector, not the commercial sector.

The illusion that there are places where the recreational fishers can’t get to is false. My 38 foot boat does eight knots (downhill) and distance is a problem where as some recreational fishers’ boats can do 30 knots. I am now seeing them 50 miles out to sea, very mobile indeed.

The price I get for my fish has not increased in the last 10 years but our running costs have gone up a huge amount and the poor fish picks up the slack. The price of crayfish has been very low and some crayfishers are now doing five-day trips. Day one, they pull their pots then go wetlining, day two, they go wetlining, day three, they pull their pots then go wetlining, day four, just wetlining and day five, pull their pots and go home.

On some boats the money from the fish is used to pay the crew’s wages. Whether this is right or wrong is not the point, they are only doing what they are allowed and the Department of Fisheries send out very mixed signals. They say conserve the stocks but when it comes to access it is the bigger catchers that are rewarded by gaining greater access. This only encourages people to invest more, catch heaps of fish and get the rewards.

With modern electronics a simple card is put into a plotter, up comes in some cases 20 years of knowledge in an instant. Modern technology ‘deskills’ us, once some good ground is known it is not long until it is known and targeted by a lot of fishers. Both commercial and recreational fishers are too efficient and it is the fish that suffer as a consequence.

The way that the Department of Fisheries researchers determine catch history and stock exploitation is via commercial fishing returns. However, some people ‘pad’ their return by recording more fish than they really catch to make their history look better than it is. The problem with this is it can give a false view of the stock. It worries me and other commercial fishers that the Department of Fisheries admit they do not check the accuracy of our catch returns in any way yet very important decisions i.e. stock status and catch history, are made on inaccurate catch figures.

As a commercial fisherman it distresses me greatly when I am fishing and small (undersized) dhufish come up. I make every effort to return them but have had little success. The best method I have found is to move to another spot. If you don't know what is down there you can't regret not catching it but I do believe the 'release weight' seems to be a great idea and I will be trying it out.

These are just my views, thank you for your time.

Note, this presented in June 2004. Emphasis/bolding added by me. 

He got a great response from the audience.

Worth a read, or a re-read http://www.recfishwest.org.au/DhufishWorkshopProceedings.pdf

TerryF
=====
Beavering away in the background.......

roberta's picture

Posts: 641

Date Joined: 08/07/08

Terry

Mon, 2008-10-13 12:51

Hubbie's mate went to Jurien a couple of years ago and Fisheries did some trials on releasing under sized dhuie's, they put them in cages, different depths and left them over night (I assume cage was put down very slowly etc) but next morning (slowly I hope) they pulled them and 9 out of 10 dhuie's were dead.  Hubbie has released successfully undersized dhuie's he's found that you have to bring any fish (as you don't know what you've got on the end of your line in 60 metres plus)) up very slowly (we use reef master reels) and most undersize dhuie's go back (with release weight)  As far as snapper all undersize snapper we have caught all go back with a flurry of activity. We've found bringing up any fish very slowly and if undersize, sometimes with a little bit of help they will go back.  I suppose I'll get a bit of flak from the sports fishing fellas on this site but this pump pump reel them in at any cost of course they will blow their bag and you most certainly in the majority of weighted releases won't go back, sorry fellas just my opinion, don't want to step on anybody's toes.

 

 

SPEWIE LEWIE

Andy Mac's picture

Posts: 3111

Date Joined: 03/02/06

Excellent perspective from a concerned pro.

Mon, 2008-10-13 12:58

I have to agree that greater efficiencies overcompensate for depleted stocks.
In other words our ever increasing ability to find and catch the remaining fish (through the use of technology) makes it appear that there are no (or minimal) declines in catch rates.
Just because we are still catching plenty of fish doesn't indicate that the fish aren't in decline.
Maybe I should can that new sounder I have on order.Frown

Cheers

Andy Mac

GOATRUTAR's picture

Posts: 3669

Date Joined: 12/04/07

Kind of missed the point

Mon, 2008-10-13 16:16

Kind of missed the point Andy as it wasn't about the Pro with a conscience but the remark about the undersize snapper and their ability to be released! 

.

 

IF IT SMELLS LIKE FISH IT MUST BE GOOD FOR YOU!

Andy Mac's picture

Posts: 3111

Date Joined: 03/02/06

Dont worry

Mon, 2008-10-13 16:43

I got that point too, loud and clear but thought that the electronics comment resonnated pretty well too, and was quite eloquently put.

Cheers

Andy Mac

GOATRUTAR's picture

Posts: 3669

Date Joined: 12/04/07

It was an attempted

Mon, 2008-10-13 16:48

It was an attempted hi-jack!LOL!Laughing

IF IT SMELLS LIKE FISH IT MUST BE GOOD FOR YOU!

Andy Mac's picture

Posts: 3111

Date Joined: 03/02/06

not quite

Mon, 2008-10-13 16:52

Laughing

Cheers

Andy Mac

Posts: 370

Date Joined: 11/08/05

Attempted hijack

Mon, 2008-10-13 18:05

Quote:
It was an attempted hi-jack!LOL!

Nope, not a hijack, it was commenting on:-

Quote:
lol.... to think a pro boat would take the time to return fish properly is a joke in itself...to much time and effort.....

and

Yup Luke It aint gonna happen ay? 

Goatrutar and luke.

I'm still waiting for you to contact me about that talk. You have my email, phone number, postal address, etc. I'm not quite so busy this week if you have the time.

You never never know if you never never go... Oh, sorry, that's the Territory's slogan.

TerryF
=====
Beavering away in the background.......

Tony Halliday's picture

Posts: 270

Date Joined: 14/06/07

simple solution chaps

Mon, 2008-10-13 13:33

The Pro-fisherman would be more "pro-release" if they where kept to a quota number of fish over 50cm, and not just tonnage.

For them, they can get more fish from 40~50cm snapper to the market on a tonnage quota, than if the fish are limited to heavier fish in the +50cm range..
not rocket science, when you limit them to a maximum number of fish or tonnage, wich eaver comes first, they will toos back the little ones and only keep biger fish ( yes I know they breeders, but how can you convince these guys to fish for the future and not for the NOW pocket!!!)

cheers

Tony

Full-time piscatorial-idiot, in The Vines. "It is always in season for old men to learn." Aeschylus (525-456 BC) Greek poet.
Supporter of Meals on Reels

jersey's picture

Posts: 94

Date Joined: 12/06/08

A pro with a brain

Mon, 2008-10-13 17:51

I read with great interest the comments of the Pro fisherman from Dongara,and I complement him on the whole article,it says what most recreational fisherman have been saying,and I quote,The cray fisherman go out for 5 day trips,1 day wet linning  pull pots,day 2 wet line,day 3 pots wet linning and so on,then the money goes to pay the crew? they offset the fuel and bait through tax and then fish,I wonder who is doing more to deplete the fish stokes,personnaly  i think the cray fisherman should only be allowed to catch crays,no fin fish,and leave the wet line fisherman have their shasre of the fishing stokes,and the recreationals a lower bag limit,and as for the comment that the Fisheries used cages too see the effect it would have on the capurted fish,I did not think them very smart this proves it, put any living creature in a trap it will be damaged during the   capture.(handling,decompreesion)2 return to depths( water pressure on them as they go down plus recompression,3 not being able to get out,how many wild creatures will beat themselves up trying to get out,then pulled up again,and to think these fisheries morons get paid for this Il bet if I was allowed to get two or three,treat them the same way ,the result would be the sameYelljersey

Faulkner Family's picture

Posts: 1662

Date Joined: 11/03/08

dont know much about wetliners

Mon, 2008-10-13 18:41

but do the bring the fish in with in one hour or leave them over night ????

because if it is over night it is no wonder they wont go back is it ??

Just wondering

 SANDY

 

"A family that fishes together stays together"

roberta's picture

Posts: 641

Date Joined: 08/07/08

wetliners

Mon, 2008-10-13 18:52

Hi Sandy

We know a drop liner in Leeman and he puts all his fish in a icy slurry and sometimes stays over night then he takes catch to Canningvale Markets, don't know about his undersize rate or throw backs, they never tell you.  There is 3 professional fishmen in Leeman now and one crayboat that does charters fishing and diving, like to know their catch rate and their release also.

 

SPEWIE LEWIE

GOATRUTAR's picture

Posts: 3669

Date Joined: 12/04/07

Sandy the drop lines the

Tue, 2008-10-14 08:29

Sandy the drop lines the pro's use don't stay in the water long.

 They may drop 5 or 6 with 10 hooks on each and when the last one is dropped they pull them up and then reset or move to a new location.

They may find a school and just sit on it.The lines are placed right in the zone so if they are hungry they may be loaded up in the matter of minutes!

Some cases they may just use 2 lines if its firing up!

IF IT SMELLS LIKE FISH IT MUST BE GOOD FOR YOU!

Faulkner Family's picture

Posts: 1662

Date Joined: 11/03/08

Thanks Matt

Tue, 2008-10-14 17:36

i just was not sure how it worked alot clearer now thanks

SANDY

 

"A family that fishes together stays together"

Faulkner Family's picture

Posts: 1662

Date Joined: 11/03/08

Hi roberta

Mon, 2008-10-13 21:21

Sorry ment to read how long do they leave there lines in the water one hour two hours or over night ????

 SANDY

 

"A family that fishes together stays together"

Watto069's picture

Posts: 306

Date Joined: 15/01/08

Interesting read. I have

Mon, 2008-10-13 21:09

Interesting read. I have never had a problem with letting snapper go. They are one of the more hardy fish IMO.

It is evident there has been widespread
confusion amongst recreational
fishers on what the prime purpose
of the closure is, whether it is to
reduce recreational catch and effort or
provide spawning protection or both.
Some within the recreational sector
consider that if a four month closure
is to apply then it should be applied
to both sectors. This highlights the
lack of knowledge by some within
the recreational sector of the stringent
measures that are either in place or
coming into place in these commercial
fisheries to manage their catch of
demersal scalefish within recommended
levels.

I would like to know what these so called stringent measures are that are being applied to the commercial fisheries because it seems to me that they are allowed to fish when and where ever they want with little restriction

So many fishing spots. Not enough sickies!!!!!!!

Posts: 370

Date Joined: 11/08/05

Quote:I would like to know

Mon, 2008-10-13 22:20

Quote:
I would like to know what these so called stringent measures are that are being applied to the commercial fisheries because it seems to me that they are allowed to fish when and where ever they want with little restriction

See http://fishwrecked.com/node/14741

TerryF
=====
Beavering away in the background.......

harro's picture

Posts: 614

Date Joined: 07/02/08

was very interesting

Mon, 2008-10-13 22:33

i just wish more pros had the same thought ..

that was somewhat heartwarming.. and truly if everyone not just pros felt the same the problem wouldnt be half as bad as it is now.

this guy seems to have alot of respect , knowing he is out there to earn his rightfull income, but knowingly also the effects it has...

thanks for a good perspective..

prob too late and prob one in a million but good to see anyhow.

this site has been flooded by  concerned fishermen, recs and pros regarding all this..

seems the bans that were originally implaced deffinately hit home, sure we are all concerned about our fish stocks and i,m sure alot of us now know just how bad they are, me personally didnt know how bad things were getting, but without repeating other threads and very important comments, sure we need to do something and it needs to be across the board..!!!

peace

harro

i aint been out in 4 weeks and i,m sure as hell gonna nail me some fresh fillets this weekend, so i,m bloody glad the ban didn,t happen

otherwise i would of been pissed.

Watto069's picture

Posts: 306

Date Joined: 15/01/08

Cheers Terry atleast that

Mon, 2008-10-13 23:10

Cheers Terry atleast that has shed some light on the commercial restrictions

So many fishing spots. Not enough sickies!!!!!!!

Posts: 97

Date Joined: 28/08/06

G'day guys Before moving up

Tue, 2008-10-14 11:56

G'day guys

Before moving up here I was quite oblivious to the way in which pro's operated. I was of the same impression of rape and pilliage. After meeting alot of the guys up here I have completely changed my opinion. Firstly in regard to the crayfisherman and wetlining they can no longer catch fish unless they previously held a wetline licence. Even fish they bring up in their pots they must released generally to the men in the grey suits. This includes baldies, rankin cod, emperors, pinkies and the like. They cannot even keep one for a feed. This is even worse at the Abrolos. Tangle's stated some figures a while back when this rule came in and it was truly shocking. We have probably 5 or so wetliners which work out of Kalbarri and I would estimate that they would be lucky to fish 50 days in the year so when they fish yes they do bring fish in. Thats their's and their families livelyhoods. I think we all need to stop the us and them mentality and focus on solutions rather than blame. I'm sure that anyone who has a vested interest whether financial or recreational ( pro's, rec's, retail, charter ) would lack intelligence to keep on the path of mass destruction of something that we all get so much out of.

Cheers Mick    

Few men desire real freedom. Most men simply desire a kind master

Adam Gallash's picture

Posts: 7815

Date Joined: 29/11/05

Good comment

Tue, 2008-10-14 20:35

Good comment there Mick, presents both sides of the argument well.

Posts: 97

Date Joined: 28/08/06

Here you go

Wed, 2008-10-15 11:27

Here you go guys, this is tangles thread on fish caught in pots.

http://fishwrecked.com/node/13608

Pretty interesting read

Cheers Mick

 

Few men desire real freedom. Most men simply desire a kind master