going to be the best option but the 260 has slightly better cone angle for out deep and more elements so is supposed to be more sensitive but you have to account for losses going through hull,another thing to consider is do you have room and accsess to fit a m260 they are not small
M260 is definatley a better tranny than the B164, but as Scottnofish suggests, not much in it given hull losses.
My mate just put a B164 in a brand new CC 685 explorer and is happy. If you want to go deeper than 200m, I would got the M260 though. Less than 200m, the B164.
scottnofish
Posts: 1617
Date Joined: 28/08/07
a through hull is always
going to be the best option but the 260 has slightly better cone angle for out deep and more elements so is supposed to be more sensitive but you have to account for losses going through hull,another thing to consider is do you have room and accsess to fit a m260 they are not small
JohnF
Posts: 2836
Date Joined: 07/07/10
M260 is definatley a better
M260 is definatley a better tranny than the B164, but as Scottnofish suggests, not much in it given hull losses.
My mate just put a B164 in a brand new CC 685 explorer and is happy. If you want to go deeper than 200m, I would got the M260 though. Less than 200m, the B164.
Boston Whaler 235 Conquest......getting the flogging it was built for.
scottnofish
Posts: 1617
Date Joined: 28/08/07
m260 going cheap in the 4 sale
http://fishwrecked.com/forum/transducer-m260-1kw-hull-wetbox-brand-new
redfin
Posts: 96
Date Joined: 07/11/08
I have the b164 matched to
I have the b164 matched to the 585 in a carribean 26 couldn't be happier. have fished out to 300mtrs still got plenty of power to go.
cruisecraft
Posts: 2
Date Joined: 20/01/14
m260 b164
Went m260 thanks all for your input picture is crystal at 30 knots yet go out deep for further testing.