Welcome to the world of stupidity and PC

Well this one is just hard to believe and again shows you why goverment agencies are just filled with buffoons and paper-chasing idiots

 

I quote...

http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/world/11892976/no-evidence-water-prevents-dehydration/

 

 

'No evidence' water prevents dehydration

 

Producers of bottled water are now forbidden by UK law from claiming their products will prevent dehydration after a three-year investigation from EU officials.

Britain's The Telegraph has reported the decision was made on the basis there was no evidence to prove the previously undisputed fact.

Producers of bottled water will face a two-year jail sentence if they defy the edict, which comes into force in the UK next month.

Last night, critics claimed the EU was at odds with both science and common sense.

Conservative MEP Roger Helmer said the law was "stupidity writ large."

"The euro is burning, the EU is falling apart and yet here they are: highly-paid, highly-pensioned officials worrying about the obvious qualities of water and trying to deny us the right to say what is patently true," he told The Telegraph.

"If ever there were an episode which demonstrates the folly of the great European project then this is it."

Britain's National Health Service guidelines clearly state drinking water helps avoid dehydration, and that Britons should drink at least 1.2 litres per day.

The Department for Health disputed the wisdom of the new law.

"Of course water hydrates. While we support the EU in preventing false claims about products, we need to exercise common sense as far as possible," a spokesman said.

A meeting of 21 scientists in Parma, Italy, concluded that reduced water content in the body was a symptom of dehydration and not something that drinking water could subsequently control.

Now the EFSA verdict has been turned into an EU directive which was issued on Wednesday.

The Nutrition Society spokesman Prof Brian Ratcliffe said dehydration was usually caused by a clinical condition and that one could remain adequately hydrated without drinking water.

"The EU is saying that this does not reduce the risk of dehydration and that is correct," he said.

"This claim is trying to imply that there is something special about bottled water which is not a reasonable claim."

 

 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Right now we all know how cr@p that finding is and in fact against every published medical journal!!!

 

Maybe we should have a "  fired for stupidity clause" in every civil servants contract ???? 

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Tony Halliday: ~Meals on Reels ~

 It takes a strong fish to swim against the current. Even a dead one can float with it

"It is always in season for old men to learn." Aeschylus (525-456 BC)

"In a mad world only the mad are sane." Akira Kurosawa (1910-1998)


snappermiles's picture

Posts: 2100

Date Joined: 05/11/10

i wonder if jessica meurwig

Tue, 2011-11-22 10:31

and her bunch of useless oxegen theives has anything to do with it! there all full of useless conclusions that dont show the truth too

____________________________________________________________________________

ALL FISHERMEN ARE LIARS EXCEPT YOU AND ME! AND IM NOT SO SURE ABOUT YOU!

Posts: 2006

Date Joined: 16/05/09

You beat me too that comment.

Tue, 2011-11-22 11:58

You beat me too that comment. Must be the same scientists.

Posts: 408

Date Joined: 23/11/09

Lets test it

Tue, 2011-11-22 10:49

 we'll put two groups in the desert.

The researchers in this crock in one group and 'normal' people in the other.

The normal people will have water. The researchers will not.

They will spend five days out there.

Wonder what theyll think of their theory then..................

____________________________________________________________________________

.

 

Posts: 361

Date Joined: 09/08/09

Another point of view is,

Tue, 2011-11-22 11:01

Another point of view is, that some (hard to estimate the percentage) customers, if they have the choice between bottle of water which has the sign “this water will hydrate you” and one which hasn’t, they will pick the one with the sign. Even if tap water does exactly the same job. So that’s probably why this issue started – to stop bottled water manufacturers from claiming non existent or absolutely common benefits of the product.

But I have to agree, that most of the time EU bureaucrats seem to have too much time on their hands and just make more rules and regulations to keep the job. That’s partly why the EU is in the s$*ts.

 

Tony Halliday's picture

Posts: 2500

Date Joined: 14/06/07

 how about a simple statement

Tue, 2011-11-22 11:26

 how about a simple statement on each bottle,,,,

" the Dept of Health recommends 1,2lt of water per day to prevent dehydration" 

This is a true statement and fact, yet will still get them fined and sentenced!!! WTF is the world coming too!!! 

 

Australia is not far off with our Bureacrats running around telling us how to raise our kids, pat our dogs, change wheels on cars... ( yes the RAC now says it's not safe for your daughter to change her own car tire, yes she needs a proffesional!!! tell my Nana that, she was changing tires at 70 on the farm!)

 

What we seeing is a breeding of a cancer civil service that consumes huge parts of a countries GDP revenue for bugger all productivity back into the system.

Ask every civil servant: "  do you add wealth to the country or cost it wealth" & " what is your value added figure compared to your cost?"

and guess what 60%+ will be leaches on your tax paying dollar... 

____________________________________________________________________________

Tony Halliday: ~Meals on Reels ~

 It takes a strong fish to swim against the current. Even a dead one can float with it

"It is always in season for old men to learn." Aeschylus (525-456 BC)

"In a mad world only the mad are sane." Akira Kurosawa (1910-1998)

Posts: 53

Date Joined: 19/08/11

Even funnier is the bent banana law!

Tue, 2011-11-22 12:33

 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/2453204/Bent-banana-and-curved-cucumber-rules-dropped-by-EU.html

 

 

A majority of EU member states, including Britain and Ireland, have voted to reform rules like EC Commission Regulation No 2257/94, which caused international ridicule by stating that all bananas must be "free of abnormal curvature" and at least 14 cm in length.

Imperfectly-shaped fruit and vegetables may now be back on supermarket shelves by 2009.

France, Italy, Spain and Greece opposed the reforms and were accused by officials of unfairly seeking to protect the interests of their farmers.

Mariann Fischer Boel, the European agriculture commissioner, has said that she also wants to scrap a swathe of regulations on produce such as onions, garlic, caulifower and spinach.

Speaking before the vote she said the rules were outdated and especially inappropriate at the time of a world food shortages.

She said: "In this era of high prices and growing demand, it makes no sense to throw (misshapen fruit and vegetables) away or destroy them. It shouldn't be the EU's job to regulate these things."

Under the present regulations, Class 1 cucumbers must be "practically straight" and be bent by a gradient of no more than 1/10.

Produce that does not meet the minimum standards can not at present be sold as second-class, meaning many edible items are thrown away by farmers.