and not a part timer. This clowns is just not good enough 

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/how-you-can-be-fined-500-for-leaving-your-home-without-a-mask/ar-AAMH1nd?ocid=msedgntp

NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian confirmed on Thursday police were cracking down on on people not following restrictions.

Fines around face mask requirements were more than doubled from $200 to $500, and 1,000 police officers being deployed to enforce the rules.

One woman posted to a local community group that she stumbled on police at Bondi Beach 'checking everyone's ID for suburb compliance and asking to show you've got a mask with you'.

'If not, you get a $500 fine on the spot,' the woman said.

People commenting on the woman's post said they also saw police out enforcing the rule, along with the 10km limit.

here on the last lockdown, checking 

 Got my first jab of Pfizer last Wednesday - all good. Bit of a sore arm for about a day and that was it in terms of side effects. 

 Got my second Pfizer 5G jab tomorrow. Wife had her second last week and no issues so hopefully I'm the same.

interesting article

cant help but wonder how much money is being made by big pharmacutical companys out of this vaccine program

money talks even in a human pandemic , and why the possible need for the 3rd jab in the rich , when the poor still wait ??

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/who-tells-rich-countries-to-stop-giving-booster-vaccines/ar-AAMWdBk?ocid=msedgntp

The World Health Organisation has told rich countries to stop giving booster vaccinations to allow for more Covid-19 jabs to be distributed by poorer countries.

The UN health body said halting booster shots until at least the end of September would help ease the drastic inequity in dose distribution between rich and poor nations.

WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said that the move would help towards the goal of enabling 'at least 10 percent of the population of every country to be vaccinated'.

Global vaccine figures show that 84 percent of administered doses have gone into the arms of people in high and upper-middle-income countries. By contrast, just 0.3 percent of doses have been administered in low-income countries.

Despite the disparity between rich and poor countries, some nations that have better access to vaccines - such as the UK, Israel and Germany - are already either offering booster jabs, or signalling their intention to do so.

Pictured: An Israeli woman receives a third coronavirus vaccine injection at a senior center in Jerusalem, Wednesday, Aug. 4, 2021. The WHO has told rich countries to stop giving booster vaccinations to allow for more Covid-19 jabs to be distributed to poorer countries© Provided by Daily Mail Pictured: An Israeli woman receives a third coronavirus vaccine injection at a senior center in Jerusalem, Wednesday, Aug. 4, 2021. The WHO has told rich countries to stop giving booster vaccinations to allow for more Covid-19 jabs to be distributed to poorer countries
According to The Daily Telegraph, booster (or third) jabs are set to be offered to 32 million Britons starting as early as next month amid fears that the efficacy of the vaccine against Covid-19 and emerging variants could begin to decline.

Ministers are reportedly planning to deliver an average of 2.5 million third doses a week, beginning the first week of September, the newspaper said on Wednesday.

All adults aged 50 or over, as well as people that are immuno-suppressed - will be offered the booster jab, with pharmacies being drafted in to aid the roll-out.

The UK is not the only one. Israel last month began rolling out a booster shot for the over-60s, while Germany said Tuesday it would start offering third doses of the two-shot Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines from September.

The UN health agency has for months raged against the glaring and growing imbalance, branding it a moral outrage.

Tedros told a press conference that he understood why countries wanted to protect their citizens from the more transmissible Delta variant of the virus, which was first identified in India.

 Meanwhile in Sydney an unvaccinated bloke in his 20's dies from COVID, literally just drops dead with no other underlying health issues. This is the stark reality of how deadly the virus can be. So it's a literal roll the dice situation for having it or not. 

Two doses after 5 or 6 months is down to 16% effective (according to recent studies from Israel).

 Had my second Pfizer yesterday afternoon. So far so good!

Double jabbed with PZ.... No side effects! Happy days...

Beer, Whiskey and BBQ are more likely to cause me long term issues than any side effects from the jab, and i happily make that choice week after week also 

Using Australia's latest stats, if you are under 50 your CFR (Case Fatality Rate) is still less than 1 in a 1,000.
(Under 40 population is 2 in 10,000. Under 30 population is less than 1 in 10,000 ... less chance than dying in a car accident each year travelling 20k).

I again post these age demographic stats because I just don't understand why our authorities around the world are pushing all age demographics to be vaccinated.
Like Influenza, we are not likely to eradicate Covid19 from our population in the near future so why are we so determined to move towards a situation where most of our population will be pressured in to getting a vaccine that offers them little protection, and comes with greater risks than our other widely accepted vaccines.

lets go for five pages lol

good read here ,, this lady has some valid points i believe ,, especially in regards to the increase in childrens allergies and other health issue which is on the rise ,,

https://www.vaccinationdecisions.net/about-us/

About Judy Wilyman
I have been studying the vaccination topic both formally and informally since 1993 when I vaccinated my first child. Like most people questioning vaccines, I have not come from an anti-vaccination position and the debate is not about pro- or anti-vaccination. It is about the safety, efficacy and necessity for each vaccine on the schedule. Are they all safe? And are they all effective and necessary?

In 2015 I completed a PhD at the University of Wollongong answering these questions. My thesis is titled ‘A critical analysis of the Australian Government’s rationale for its vaccination policy.’ In Chapter 7 I present a discussion of the claims made by the government about the safety and efficacy of vaccines that are not supported by scientific evidence. Here is a link to this Chapter titled “The Evidence Underpinning Claims about Vaccines”

My book that is based on my PhD research titled “Australia’s Loss of Health Freedom” is now available to buy.

After completing this in-depth research I am promoting the right for this medical intervention to remain a free and informed choice, without the financial coercion that the Australian government implemented into social services policies in 2016. Here is a link to a pamphlet that summarises the four main themes of my PhD thesis – A Summary of Dr. Judy Wilyman’s PhD Thesis.

I have adopted this position because the government has not provided evidence to support the claim that all of the recommended vaccines are necessary or that they have been proven safe and effective using proper placebo controlled clinical trials. The Australian government is making claims about the safety and efficacy of vaccines that are unsupported by hard scientific evidence. That is, using true ‘inert’ placebos in safety trials.

In December 2020 in response to the false and misleading information provided by the health department and the media about a global pandemic of a new flu-like illness called COVID19 disease, I joined with doctors and lawyers to set up the company People for Safe Vaccines so we could make a legal challenge of the “science” that the government is using to claim that there is a public health emergency. This declaration of a pandemic has enabled government’s globally to remove human rights and to implement directives that are destroying the health of the population.

I have also joined with Vaccine Choice Australia (VCA) to assist in providing education to the community about the history of the control of infectious diseases. Currently VCA is touring Australia to speak with communities about the political actions we can take to restore democracy in Australia to ensure that the people’s voice is represented in government policies. Here is a link to the Stand Up Now Australia Tour that will be coming to your community soon.

In 2007 I also completed a Master of Science (Population Health) in the Faculty of Health at UOW and this included a major research project on the use of the whooping cough vaccine to control whooping cough in Australia. My research demonstrated that the whooping cough vaccine was introduced after the significant decline of deaths and serious illness to whooping cough in Australia (1950) and that many vaccinated children are still getting whooping cough. Here is a link to this research titled “An Analysis of the Federal Government’s Pertussis (Whooping Cough) Immunisation Policy“.

I have also provided a link to a summary of this research that was published in the Public Health Association of Australia’s (PHAA) newsletter in April 2009 – An Analysis of Whooping Cough Incidence: Is the vaccine effective? Whilst Peter McIntyre, director of the government’s vaccination research and surveillance unit (NCIRS), published a comment beside my referenced article with claims countering the evidence I presented, he did not provide a fully referenced copy of his claims made in the PHAA newsletter in 2009.

The University of Wollongong published my PhD thesis on its website in January 2016 but prior to publication it requested that I remove 3 Appendix’s before publication. UOW cited ‘copyright reasons’ for this request. However, these Appendix’s contained publicly available information and when I challenged the University the decision was reversed and it published the full thesis in March 2016. The information that UOW wished to remove included Appendix 1: The Ingredients of Vaccines (Reference: The Australian Immunisation Handbook (Ed 9 and 10), Appendix 2: Case Study on Thimerosal (Mercury compound) in Vaccines and Appendix 3: The Australian Government NIP (Reference: Australian Government’s Immunise Australia Program (IAP) website (2013).

The potential financial Conflicts of Interest (COI) were also removed from my thesis even though the government is required to publicise these interests on their website. Many government representatives on vaccine policy advisory boards have COI with pharmaceutical companies. This includes the chairman of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) from 2005 – 2014, Terry Nolan, and the directors of the National Centre of Immunisation Research and Surveillance (NCIRS) from 2004 – 2015, Robert Booy and Peter McIntyre. The public is entitled to be informed that these potential COI exist for individuals who directly advise the government on policy. The COI for members of the Australian government’s vaccine advisory boards were not presented on the government website until 2015 after parents pressured the government to publish them.

During the last decade I have attempted to debate my academic research but the media will not report the other side of the vaccination debate. Whilst attempting to debate my research in public forums since 2010 I have been attacked by consumer lobby groups, in particular the Australian Skeptics Inc and the Stop the Australian Vaccination Network (SAVN). Another lobby group is the Friends of Science in Medicine.

Many of these lobby groups are not scientific organisations, e.g. the Australian Skepitics Inc and SAVN, and they promote industry interests in vaccination policies by misrepresenting academic research to the public. This has been documented in many articles by my supervisor, Brian Martin. Here is a link to one of his articles summarising these attacks: ‘Judy Wilyman, PhD: how to understand attacks on a research student.’ Media censorship on this issue is also preventing proper debate of this health issue in Australia. Here is a letter that I sent to the president of the Human Rights Commission (Gillian Trigg), in September 2015, before the government implemented mandatory vaccination policies in its Social Welfare Bill. The Human Rights Commission did not answer this letter.

Further, in 2015 the Minister for Health, Sussan Ley, and the Minister for Social Services, Christian Porter, would not attend a public forum to present the reasons for the necessity for the No Jab No Pay legislation that was implemented in Australia January 2016.

Qualifications
I have a Bachelor of Science degree and I have practised as a science teacher for 20 years. In 2004 I began researching this public health issue at the University of Wollongong (UOW). I completed a Master of Science degree (Population Health) in the Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences in 2007.This included a research project analysing the Australian Government’s Policy on Whooping Cough. In 2007 I continued my research with a PhD. The University of Wollongong would not provide supervisors in the Faculty of Health for this project. It was recommended that the PhD be completed in the area of Science and Technology Studies in the Humanities because of the politics involved in vaccination policies.

In 2008 – 2010 I transferred to the Environmental Science Department at Murdoch University to research and lecture in environmental health issues. I transferred back to Wollongong University in 2011 to complete my PhD investigating the Australian government’s reasons for its current National Immunisation Program (NIP). My PhD includes an examination of the science in the government’s vaccination policy and a critique of the influences in the decision to use an increasing number of vaccines in children.

Motivation for this Research
I have 3 children – 2 vaccinated and 1 unvaccinated. My motivation for investigating the government’s vaccination policies was the increase in chronic illness in children that teachers were observing in the nineties as the government continued to increase the number of vaccines on the national immunisation schedule. This correlation is described in the poster that I presented to health professionals at the Australian National Health Promotion Conference in Perth in 2009. Whilst a correlation is not proof of causation it is important that this association is investigated before governments recommend an increasing number of vaccines to children in public health policies.

Please note that it has also become necessary for me to address the way lobby groups are using social media websites and the mainstream media to present disinformation about my research to the public. Many of these lobby groups are funded by industry and are promoting industry interests. The information I am providing on this website is academic research for public debate to ensure that decisions made on health are supported in the medical literature.

Many lobby groups are disparaging researchers reputations and not debating the scientific issues. This has been documented on the Lobby Group page of my website. This website is set up to present an academic debate of vaccination (free of emotional arguments) and it contains information that will be presented for the completion of a PhD. The information has also been published and presented in peer-reviewed journals and at academic conferences. The science in public health policies should not be selective and consumers must be involved in debating these issues.

Vaccinating in Australia
Whilst the government claims that vaccination in Australia is not compulsory there is pressure placed on parents to use 11 vaccines before a child is 1 year of age. The pressure placed on parents/adults to vaccinate is in the form of financial incentives, childcare places and employment. It is also strongly emphasised that it is each person’s responsibility to vaccinate for the community good. The financial incentive for “fully” vaccinating a child was increased on 1 July 2012 to $2,100. At the same time the government introduced 3 new vaccines to the national immunisation program (NIP) and stated that these vaccines were now necessary to receive the benefit. To choose not to vaccinate (or to selectively vaccinate) and still obtain the welfare benefit parents are required to get a doctor’s signature. In some states since 2014 a doctor’s signature has also become necessary to enrol in childcare centres and for employees to work in some institutions yet doctors are being told by the Australian Medical Association (AMA) that they do not have to sign these forms.

In other words, instead of doctor’s requiring parental consent to administer vaccines (a medical procedure) parents are required to get a doctor’s signature to refuse this medical procedure. This is an infringement of our human rights and bodily integrity.

In Australia vaccination is not compulsory but the government is pressuring parents to use more and more vaccines without discussing the ingredients of vaccines. The ingredients and the side-effects of vaccines require public debate for inclusion in public health policies yet the Australian public has been excluded from the decision-making process. Like all drugs the risks of vaccines increase with every vaccine that is used and no vaccine can be used without side-effects in some individuals.

This website has been set up because there are many community members concerned about the number of vaccines parents are being asked to use in their children and the information that is being provided to the public. I believe vaccination should be a personal choice requiring the individual’s consent after being fully informed of the risks – as is required for all medical procedures. Pressuring individuals to use a medical procedure is an infringement of human rights (the International Bill of Human Rights applies to all countries). Vaccination in Australia should be promoted to the public on the risks and benefits of the procedure and not tied to financial incentives or workplace requirements.

In the 1990’s I became aware of the significant increase in chronic illness that was occurring in children. By 2004, 41% of children (0 -14 years of age) had a chronic illness 1. The diseases that have been increasing since the late 80’s include allergies, anaphylaxis, ADHD, autism, coeliac disease, cancer and autoimmune diseases (e.g. arthritis and diabetes). The medical journals and animal studies link the ingredients of vaccines as a cause of these diseases. Although the increase in these diseases correlates to the increasing use of vaccines, the government has not funded research that would prove or disprove this plausible link. The Australian government claims it is a coincidence that these diseases have increased with the increasing use of vaccines but does not provide scientific-evidence to support this statement.

Reference:

1. Australian Government, Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS),

4829.0.55.001 Health of children in Australia: A Snapshot, 2004-05 [/pane]

Qualifications

1982: University of NSW, Bachelor of Science Degree
1986: Wollongong University, Diploma of Education (Science)
2007: Wollongong University (Health and Behavioural Sciences Department), Master of Science (Population Health) | Research Project (Partial fulfilment of the degree of Master of Science): An Analysis of the Australian Government’s Vaccination Policy on Whooping Cough: High Distinction
2008 – 2011: Murdoch University (Environmental Science Department) and Wollongong University, research and teaching.
2011 – December 2015: Researching a PhD at the University of Wollongong (School of Humanities and Social Inquiry). [/pane]

How a Healthy Person became a Case of Disease in 2020-21
Interviews with Dr. Judy Wilyman
Nobel Prize Laureate 1960 Sir Frank MacFarlane Burnet and DFAT
COVID19 Vaccines are Causing Blood Clotting in the Majority of Tested Patients
The WHO Declares all PCR Tests at High CT to be Potentially 100% False Positives.
Copyright © 2021 · Vaccination Decisions on Genesis Framework · Wo

polio vaccine is often quoted as a no brainer in why vaccines are all good ,,

food for thought as we go for 5 pages on it below ,

polio vaccine taking years to get the process right from starting in 1938, to, 1950 having one then 5 years of testing from 1950-1955 before release to use it, then up to 1961, to get the right mix ,,

the cutter incident is not agood example for sure ,,,

https://www.weirtondailytimes.com/news/local-news/2021/01/a-look-back-at-mass-polio-vaccinations-of-50s-60s/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1383764/

this proposal makes sense imo

GPs call for 'no-fault' compensation scheme around AstraZeneca vaccine delivery

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-10/covid-19-vaccine-indemnity-scheme-not-yet-resolved/100363498

"Dr" Wilyman (not a medical doctor) and her thesis is not held in high regard by a number of professionals, and you can find the relevant criticism simply by using google.  Try Sciblogs, Unsound vaccine thesis or how to review a PhD, Life in the Fast Lane, The wilyman Phd, Judith Wilyman - Wikipedia, and the list goes on.  Stood for the senate in WA for the informed medical opinions party in 2019.  Most of the information that I could find that wasn't written by her is not very flattering, and her thesis and how she got it is questioned by many.  She has been an antivaxxer for a very long time, totally biased in her opinions.  I think I would rather trust my own judgement and medical training.

 344 new cases in NSW , 2 more have died. 

Second jab done and dusted. 

 And here's a first world  state on it's knees because morons won't vaccinate.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/11/us/covid-texas-hospitalizations-icu.html?smtyp=cur&smid=fb-nytimes&fbclid=IwAR2yEiks6gllXPZ0riodJ_Xqo9U3wpb3oMTcdvw21dtOd1GNjZoexrJtAo8

unintended consequences

Breast cancer support groups have raised concerns that women could die from preventable cancer if they are denied long term access to routine BreastScreen mammogram appointments.

Key points:
All BreastScreen centres have stopped taking appointments for later this year
Health officials say it is to protect patients and to redirect staff to help with the pandemic response
Advocates are worried a drop in preventative diagnosis could lead to avoidable breast cancer deaths
Centres across New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory have been closed due to coronavirus outbreaks and there is no indication when they will reopen.

The Breast Cancer Network Australia has raised concerns about the decision and director of policy and advocacy Vicki Durston said it could have dire consequences.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-18/breastscreen-pause-mammograms-nsw-act-covid-lockdowns/100384924

keep it up

reckon we can get this to 5 pages any day now ,, lol

tip of the iceberg on how this whole situation is affecting peoples lives ,,

A Victorian woman slapped with a suspended jail term and criminal record for having a picnic with her dying father while subject to quarantine rules has won an appeal to have her sentence reduced.

https://www.watoday.com.au/national/western-australia/victorian-woman-given-jail-term-for-visiting-dying-father-in-wa-wins-appeal-20210818-p58jrf.html?fbclid=IwAR23KhLlAiHbmdCEH0F26nxkWDj4jwUJn6tPuNF__1V9-it3meO9VcUorLs

interesting read below from abc ... no mention of travel insurance in all that ,,, which imo is a must before we would go overseas , regardless of vacination or not ,,

SCIENCE
COVID-19 vaccine passports: When international borders open, how will global travel work?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2021-08-19/covid-19-vaccine-passports-international-travel-borders/100383630

We know that there is a bloody awful virus circulating, that seems to knock off a reasonable percentage of those that get it, and affects a much higher percentage with debilitating long term side effects.

We know that there is now a more contageous strain circulating than the one previously, and there is the possibility of other strains getting to us in the future.

We know that there are a lot of people who believe this is a conspiracy, that the virus doesn't exist, or that it does but vaccines don't work, or that it is brough upon us by Big Pharma or the World Economic Forum, or Batman, or that a variety of groups are varying vaccine results to make a big quid.

Really, I don 't give a s**t.  You have a right to believe what you want, express your ideas, its a somewhat free country.  For those knockers, conspiracy theorists etc, please take your family and go and catch Covid and prove your point, just like Dr Marshall did with Helicobacter.

Form you own opinions, but please don't push them down others peoples throats, you may do some serious harm. 

For me, I am over 70, have had 45 years experience in the pharmacy industry, I believe this virus exists, I don't want the damn thing or if I do get it, I want its effects minimised.  What choices do I have?  None other than the vaccines that are available, which may give me a good chance of not getting long term effects or death.  I view the vaccine as being better than nothing at all, and it may in fact be as good as the "Big Pharma" represents.

Apart from being a doomsday prepper, what other choices do we have, so please make positive contributions and spend your time finding an answer to the problem, not just knocking what options we do have.

Are we at Page 5 yet??????????????????

 To me it's a matter of deciding what your fear most, the virus or the vaccine, and then acting accordingly.

Personally I fear the virus a a hell of a lot more than I fear an occassional jab in the arm.

Second jab booked for next week, and if I need ongoing boosters so be it.

Seems you may be fudging figures to suit your argument Kalsteve.

You compared 2019 flu deaths to 2020 covid deaths, why didn't you compare the 2020 deaths for both ?

Figures I have show 36 flu deaths in Australia for 2020 (902 deaths for 2019, not the "about 1200" you quoted) and NO flu deaths for 2021.

This is from the National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System, not from from some crackpot antivax website.

See the link:

https://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/clinical/australia-records-zero-flu-deaths-over-past-12-mon

But of course antivaxxers never let the truth get in the way of their bullshit...................

 For what its worth i have an elderly relative in hospital after taking her vaccine. She is old but this may be the last straw for her. If she hadn't have taken the vaccine i guess she'd still be in her lounge chair safe and sound. Food for thought i guess.

 a fish vaccince years ago, havnt caught shit since!

 Each to their own but I'm just amazed how many people think their keyboard research trumps the thousands of actual professionals doing real research in the labs and hospitals. Can anyone tell me how and why so many unlinked and unrelated people would want to perpetuate a COVID hoax as suggested? I'm no genius but it makes zero sense to me! 

dave id say there are a lot of sane , educated , intelligent people who are not anti vaxers and dont believe in hoax or conspiracy theories ,,people who normally have had vaccines in the past , but with this one their just hesitant and waiting ,,,given rapid changes in info coming out and lack of actual covid in wa ,, it kind of makes sense to me ,

nowdays all gov and big pharma have huge resources to spend on spin doctors,advisers, etc call them what you will , same as at election time ,,, their promoting a certain message in all aspects of the media ,,, many of big pharma run and resource these research places at unis and elsewhere ..

with a high survival rate for most people who might catch covid combined with a very low chance of actually catching it in most of wa at present it not hard to understand why a % of people will wait ,,

i personally get dismayed at the blame game and divide this is causing ..imo it should be free choice ,,if a person gets vacinated , good on them , there choice , there supposedly protected ,,if another person chooses not to to wait ,,also their choice ,,to not be protected ,,, sort of like voting labor or libs etc ,, each person has a decision to make for their own reasons ,,

having said that i think it pays to use ones own judgement on these things , reading links or other news sources does not neccessarily make one disagree with professionals , imo it just gives you a wider scan of all potential info being put forward

then make your own choice ,,

this has some way to go yet , possibly another 2-3 years or more and the info will keep being refined as it unfolds ,

anyway on to the elusive 5th page

AstraZeneca and other COVID-19 vaccines including Moderna could prove to have longer lasting protection against the virus amid signs the Pfizer jab may start to lose effectiveness six to eight months after the second jab.

Israel was the first country in the world to reopen after securing early access to Pfizer and fully vaccinating 70 per cent of residents, but it's now experiencing a fourth wave of infections.

Other nations including Australia are watching closely as the Middle Eastern nation rushes to administer Pfizer booster jabs as the Delta strain sees infections surge to the highest level in six months.Elderly residents' protection levels from the Pfizer vaccination against the Delta strain are significantly dropping, Israel's health ministry found.

Unvaccinated people remain at most risk, being five to six times more likely to get seriously ill from Covid, but the majority of new infections in Israel are fully vaccinated people over 50.

The Financial Times reported that over-65s who received their second Pfizer shot in January are now experiencing protection rates as low as 55 per cent - although some health experts are questioning this figure.

As a result, Israel has begun offering a third Pfizer jab for over 60s and soon over-50s.
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/effectiveness-of-pfizer-starts-dropping-from-six-to-eight-months/ar-AANuqVM?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531