Mercury Optimax 225 vs Mercury v8 225 ProXS

For those that might be interested, I have made the changeover to the ProXS.

Fuel consumption - about the same, maybe a little less on the V8, but no oil.

                          Optimax            ProXS

3000 rpm               22knots            17knots

3500 rpm               25knots             22knots

3900 rpm               29knots             27knots

Top speed for Optimax was 38knots (5,300rpm) 43knots for ProXS (5,700rpm)

Optimax had a 19pitch Mirage prop, ProXS 17pitch enertia prop

So the extra torque in the 2 stroke Optimax still provided better speed at lower revs.  At 27knots they both used about the same fuel, burning about 1.2 lites per nautical mile.  The boat is 26.5feet overall but with a 7ft 5" beam, so narrow.  Total weight of the boat all up with fuel but no people and no trailer is about 1.7 tonnes.

I chose the ProXS v8 instead of the Merc 225 V6 as it should be understressed and a bigger gearbox and better torque.

Hope this helps someone.


Darren253's picture

Posts: 570

Date Joined: 23/07/16

Thanks for sharing!

Wed, 2019-11-27 10:55

 Did you consider running the Mirage prop for a true like for like comparision or would it be over propped for the ProXs?

Posts: 939

Date Joined: 26/03/17

was looking into this a few

Wed, 2019-11-27 11:18

was looking into this a few weeks ago as am lookking to put a 200hp merc 4 stroke on the new boat. ddint realise there were different types to choose from! for an average fisherman, any benefit in going the sea pro, or pro xs over the normal 4 strokes?  i got quite confused by it all... pro xs obviously v8, more powr, but heavier etc.....

Posts: 218

Date Joined: 08/03/09

The Enertia prop

Wed, 2019-11-27 11:53

was suggested as being a better prop.  If I were to use the 19pitch Mirage on the ProXS it wouldnt reach the required revs of 5,500 to 6,200.  In theory it would give higher speed at lower revs, so assuming the gearboxes were the same ratio, the performance I guess would be similar.  I tried an 18pitch prop on the ProXS it pulled 5,500 revs so dealer changed it for 17 pitch themselves.  I understand the V6 225 and 200hp are gutsy in comparison the the other makes, but that is advice is only from the dealers.  A point to remember is that the V6 has a smaller gearcase so less drag and this should be an advantage..  I had difficulty choosing, only chose the V8 as it is meant to have a bit more torque and I figured that if the V8 can now produce 450HP (with a blower) then the v8 225 shouldn't be working too hard, whereas the V6 at 225hp is the top of the range for the V6.  The weight difference I understand is only about 15kg or so.

Posts: 1097

Date Joined: 19/06/14

Not too shabby

Wed, 2019-11-27 17:43

Those figures make me feel quite good about my tub burning two litres per Nm @ 20 kts . Not too bad for a 5 ton 28 ft cat !  

____________________________________________________________________________

 My wife understands why I clean my rods n reels in the shower....

 

Posts: 939

Date Joined: 26/03/17

AWESOME.JUST A QUERY. THE

Wed, 2019-11-27 17:56

AWESOME.

JUST A QUERY. THE BoaT I AM LOOKNG AT IS RATED FOR 150-200HP, I CHOSE THE 200 EVEN THOUGH I VERY MUCH DOUBT THERE WILL BE MANY OCCASIONS WHERE will be able to reach top speed, but figured that having higher hp than necessary would put the engine under less stress? is this thinking accurate, or am i mistaken?

cheers!

ranmar850's picture

Posts: 2702

Date Joined: 12/08/12

well, for any given speed,

Wed, 2019-11-27 19:06

 You'll be spinning less rpm with the larger motor , until you get past the smaller motors' max speed. Given that the new V6 Mercs are very light, the added weight won't really come into it.

To wagyl--your higher speed at lower rpm was nothing to do with "the greater  torque of the 2-stroke". You were running a larger pitch, which will always give you more speed than a smaller pitched prop at the same rpm. Simple physics, as long as you have the same reduction ratios in the two gearboxes. Your peak rpm (5300)quoted for the 225 Opti was almost midrange of recommended max  (5000-5750).. But the current max of 5700rpm for the 225 pro Xs looks a bit low--they have a recommended max rpm range of 5600-6200, so you are right at the bottom of the recommended rpm range, and getting closer to being overpropped. Did the dealer say this was Ok? Merc will keep giving you props until you get it right, at no cost--avail yourself of this, because it is free. I accepted what the dealer said, after trying one change, and left it at the original. 18 months down the track, I was overpropped, and had to buy a second-hander of the right size.  Maybe you need to look at a different diameter, rather than just focussing on pitch alone.

There is a misconception around correct propping--not saying you are guilty of this,  wagyl--that a prop which makes you go faster at cruise rpm, but won't hit the max, is somehow better. Boats and their physics are nothing like cars, there is no such thing as overdrive.  You have to think of a boat as something  which spends its whole life driving uphill in top gear--the load is never off it.  So if it is overpropped( overgeared) the load is higher than necessary, even at medium cruise rpm.  The fact that yoiu can hit max recommended rpm isn't about how fast you can go, it about having the right prop to allow the engine to be loaded right at all rpm.

Posts: 218

Date Joined: 08/03/09

Thanks Ranmar

Thu, 2019-11-28 06:24

The dealer tried an 18p prop and then reduced it to a 17p prop after the test run.  I will give it a squirt the next time I go out and see exactly what it does and then refer back to the dealer if unhappy.

Silver fox, my friend has a 60 foot boat weighing 25 tonnes and burns 2.5 litres per nautical mile at 7knots, but 250 to 300litres/hour at 28knots.  If you are getting 2l/nm though, that sounds good.

ranmar850's picture

Posts: 2702

Date Joined: 12/08/12

Your experience sounds similar to mine ( with a 150 4s)

Thu, 2019-11-28 06:32

 I spec'd a prop ( 14.5x17 Enertia) , dealer supplied. Was only hitting 5650, IIRC, light. He wanted to see how a 14.5 x16 went. No more revs, just slower, dropped 2 knots. Weird. he talked to the Perth dealer, who told him the original 17 was the best for that motor/hull combo, so i accepted that. Wish i'd asked around more and tried more options, they were there for the asking. As I added to the fitout, including a scoop for the water intake, revs kept dropping. So after talking to a bloke over east, I took a chance and bought a 15 x15 s/hand. Pretty well fixed the problem, get 5650 loaded now (5800 max) with the same top speed as i had with the overpitched prop.  Good speeds, and you can load up for the Monties with 300 litres of extra fuel, dinghy, all the gear, and it doesn't feel it.

Posts: 218

Date Joined: 08/03/09

I don't understand however,

Thu, 2019-11-28 07:33

that the same motor produces much higher horsepower (300hp plus and 450Hp with a blower) just by supplying more fuel from the computer.  So surely the 225hp is more than capable of taking the load and is working a lot easier than the higher HP motors.  In the V6 range, to achieve the higher HP of the 225, they just allow it to rev higher with more fuel.

ranmar850's picture

Posts: 2702

Date Joined: 12/08/12

While the V8 runs from 225 to 300hp

Thu, 2019-11-28 09:59

 With the same block, there might be more to it than just more fuel. Different valve sizes, camshaft timing, compression? if you have exactly the same internal configuration for two not hugely different HP outputs from the same block, it is usually done by getting them to rev harder, ie, 130 yam vs 115, 115 suzuki vs 140. With motors such as those, you really only gain any advantage at the max rpm, cruise will likely be similar or the same as you will be running the same size props or thereabouts. I think that if you look at the actual power curve of the 225 vs the 300 in the v8's, the 300 will be pushing more HP right through the range. And the 225 V8 such as yours, is actually pushing MORE RPM than the regular 300 V8 ---  225 Pro XS is 5600-6200, as is the 300 Pro XS.  300 regular V8, same block, is 5200-6000.  Although, of course we know that the Merc  Pro XS version in any given nominal HP rating is " cough" somewhat more than what is written on the cowling, to get around transom ratings, for those who want a little bit more bang . 

Looking at the V6's, which run from 175 to 225, they probably just are running them harder ( more fuel, more advance?) to make the extra rpm --from the website  175 is 5000-5800, 225 is 5200-6000. 

Darren253's picture

Posts: 570

Date Joined: 23/07/16

 So unless going wide open,

Thu, 2019-11-28 10:34

 So unless going wide open, are you saying that you would get the same mid range perofrmance from a 175HP as a 225HP?

ranmar850's picture

Posts: 2702

Date Joined: 12/08/12

It couldb be that way, but...

Thu, 2019-11-28 20:46

 If the 225 gives you the ability to push a larger pitched prop overall, and still attain the max rpm for that motor., then you will likely have a better cruise speed for given rpm, as your gearcase ratio is the same. All of this is great in theory, of course, but boats can be weird things and prop slip can vary for no apparent reason, apparently. So this, too could affect overall performance.  So you ask the question--why would you buy the 175hp version of a motor if the 225, same weight, and only probably a grand more, is available?  It could only come down to max transom ratings. Mercury put out a notice in the US, earlier this year, stating they were suspending production of the V6 175hp variant, to enable them to concentrate on production of the higher output motors. Huge demand for most of the range and long lead times for repowers, as most of the production was going on new transoms.

I looked at some price quotes from good ole' Brisbane Marine, who has always been the only dealer who will actually put a price on the web for outboards. There was literally only $700 extra for the 225hp Pro XS, the V8, over the 225hp V6. Why wouldn't you? (Although you may only get 2 yrs warranty vs 3 yrs for the non pro XS models, thats how it is in the US, apparently)

Posts: 939

Date Joined: 26/03/17

awesome info. certainly not

Thu, 2019-11-28 10:46

awesome info. certainly not my field of expertise, but great learning!

Posts: 218

Date Joined: 08/03/09

Warranty for the ProXS

Fri, 2019-11-29 07:15

is 3years plus 3 years (last 3 years if dealer serviced) I understand.  Same for the V6.