New fish trafficking offence and new infringements from DoF
Ten times the bag limit of priority fish species or 100 kilograms of finfish fillets have been set as limits deemed to be a “commercial quantity” that would trigger a charge of fish trafficking for any person not authorised to be in possession of such a large amount of fish.
Department of Fisheries Strategic Fisheries Policy Manager, Nathan Harrison said the new offence would attract a fine of up to $400,000 for an individual or $800,000 for a body corporate and/or up to four years imprisonment.
“This is the first time the option for a magistrate to impose a jail term has been used in relation to the illegal sale of recreationally caught fish in Western Australia,” Mr Harrison said.
“It will give Fisheries and Marine Officers (FMOs) another effective way of cracking down on black market fish trading in the State and it won’t require proof of a sale.
“The priority species include Roe’s, brownlip and greenlip abalone, barramundi, coral trout, WA dhufish, baldchin groper, all rock lobsters and pink snapper. These are the popular, high value, fish species that are most likely to be involved in cases where individuals are in possession of very large quantities.”
In addition to the new fish trafficking rules, Mr Harrison said new regulations also came into force this month that have created a new tier of infringement fines to more effectively deal with mid-range offences without the need to take a matter to court, if the offender accepted the fine.
“Infringements are currently issued for a range of bag and possession limit offences and for taking totally protected fish – including under or oversized fish – and the new, second, tier of penalties will kick in when more than double the bag or possession limit is detected, or where the number of totally protected fish exceeds the bag limit,” he said.
“The outcomes of a tiered infringement system will deliver a swifter way of dealing with mid-range matters and reduce the time spent by FMOs compiling prosecution briefs, getting them back on patrol more quickly to continue monitoring the State’s fisheries.
“In the West Coast Region alone it has been estimated this measure will provide another 1000 hours of FMO time that can be spent in the field educating fishers and carrying out compliance checks, rather than preparing documentation for the courts.
“As with infringements issued now though, people who receive the new infringements, ranging between $200 and $1,000, still have the option of taking their matter to court if they choose to.”
Septimus
Posts: 146
Date Joined: 14/11/10
NEW INFRINGEMENTS - DETAILS?
Can anyone actually find details for "new infringements, ranging between $200 and $1000"?
deepwater
Posts: 1921
Date Joined: 09/05/07
Excellent
Excellent
Rob H
Posts: 5807
Date Joined: 18/01/12
sounds great, but Im afraid I
sounds great, but Im afraid I have some misgivings also with these sort "changes".
"Swifter way of dealing with..." can easily lead also to lazy and sloppy prosecutions, as the onus changes from "innocent til proven guilty" to the other way around.
While people who take "double the bag or possession limit" deserve to get hammered, remember we have seen several cases at least on here where this very situation has arisen not through deliberate overfishing, but someones genuine oversight in renewing a licence etc.
I just hope we dont see situations where F.O's "know" someone is guilty and have the power to simply hand them an infringement and let them dig a way out of it, especially if there is no certain way to recoup costs if do take it to court and win.
Great if they really are ratbags, but how many times over the years have we seen cops get it so astonishly wrong.
I know many wont agree with my view though.
Give a man a mask, and he'll show you his true face...
The older you get the more you realize that no one has a f++king clue what they're doing.
Everyone's just winging it.
TheJettyRat
Posts: 733
Date Joined: 02/03/12
If someone has 100kg of
If someone has 100kg of fillets there is no mistake, no "accidently" going over the bag there. No excuses for that kind of quantity.
Rob H
Posts: 5807
Date Joined: 18/01/12
no maybe not, but double the
no maybe not, but double the bag limit could easily come from your trusted mate (or mum/dad!)overlooking a licence renewal. And if there is no way to verify online if someones licence is valid or a fake, how could you be ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN?
Give a man a mask, and he'll show you his true face...
The older you get the more you realize that no one has a f++king clue what they're doing.
Everyone's just winging it.
Norty
Posts: 80
Date Joined: 13/12/12
no wonder theres so many
no wonder theres so many people traffikers..
punishment isn't as hard, then again.. maybe they're not deemed to be endangered enough :)
Cruise Control
Posts: 973
Date Joined: 03/11/10
One thing I am not sure of.
One thing I am not sure of. Do these limits apply in your own home or are these limits applicable on your return from your trip ?
Theoretically speaking, if you had over a period of a month a couple of really good days in the deep and you picked up your legal limit of two fish each trip, say two 30kg bass groper or similar on each trip. You would think that you would have considerably more than 20kg of fillet in the freezer. Understand that most people would give some away etc but theoretically speaking, does this put you on the wrong side of the law even though you may have acquired it within the rules ?
kmo
Posts: 127
Date Joined: 17/01/12
Yes
Possession limits apply to your home as well. You can gift fillets and/or whole fish to other people that you live with, but you need to label them appropriately so that Fisheries could verify who they belong to. Pg 32 of the 2013 fishing rules pamphlet has all the info.
D_d_001
Posts: 1522
Date Joined: 09/03/13
can just imagine the
can just imagine the fisheries department smashing the front door down and yelling "this is a raid"
lol
but would be curious to know this as well.
although ....it is actually 20kg per person....even in transport.(as opposed to 20kg per RFL) this actually means that your 4 year old may be in position of 20kgs at home without a RFL. so a family of 5 with 1 RFL may have 100kgs at home or even in transport on the road .....just not in the boat.