snapper at the north mole
Submitted by mako magic on Sat, 2009-10-31 21:04
weighed a nice snapper of 4.5kg for a customer caught yesterday morning at the north mole, said it was dead calm too, so there is still a few around
Colin Hay
Posts: 10407
Date Joined: 23/10/07
Are they allowed to keep them if they are
landbased captures?
Moderator. Proud member of the Fishwrecked "Old Farts". Make sure your subscribed to Fishwrecked Reeltime http://fishwrecked-reeltime.com/
mako magic
Posts: 5785
Date Joined: 03/08/05
i told them to be warry, im
i told them to be warry, im sure its a full ban even lanbased, not 100% sure personally
Shorty
Posts: 1549
Date Joined: 10/05/08
Yep its $5000 for the first
Yep its $5000 for the first offence,,i would be wary as well,,,
Colin Hay
Posts: 10407
Date Joined: 23/10/07
Sherbs was going to make me throw any we caught back
Luckily we only caught port jackson sharks or I would have been spewing if I had to throw a snapper back.
Moderator. Proud member of the Fishwrecked "Old Farts". Make sure your subscribed to Fishwrecked Reeltime http://fishwrecked-reeltime.com/
Faulkner Family
Posts: 17984
Date Joined: 11/03/08
nice size snapper but not
nice size snapper but not something i would be keeping atm
RUSS and SANDY. A family that fishes together stays together
mako magic
Posts: 5785
Date Joined: 03/08/05
yes agree russ, seems still
yes agree russ, seems still people arent 100% sure on whats going on.
Faulkner Family
Posts: 17984
Date Joined: 11/03/08
as far as im concerned and
as far as im concerned and aware it is a total ban of demersal fish until after 15/12/09 then its a free for all as long as you only catch your bag limit. the ramps will be absolute chaos
RUSS and SANDY. A family that fishes together stays together
Ashram
Posts: 134
Date Joined: 23/10/09
Education
I think Fisheries really need to up the exposure on the regulations. Using all types of media. Unfortunately ignorance isnt an excuse in court.
SHizz
Posts: 1556
Date Joined: 07/08/05
Key dates for the West Coast
Bodie
Posts: 3758
Date Joined: 05/11/07
i think now its upto the
i think now its upto the fishermen.
you SHOULD know the rules by now. Its been in the news, the papers, all over the web for some time now.
No excuse if you ask me.
Hazell
Posts: 194
Date Joined: 26/10/09
It would almost make me cry
It would almost make me cry to throw back a nice pinky. Im mostly catch and release but a pinky... im going to avoid bottom fishing those type of spots for the ban i reckon... remove temptation.
Ash Hazell
"A cast a day keeps the psychiatrist away"
just dhu it
Posts: 1081
Date Joined: 14/05/09
spewing
how sad would it be, you be finally catch a great pinkie or near impossible jewy of the beach or rock wall , a PB and you have to throw it back, but thats the rules
DhuBoi
Posts: 896
Date Joined: 25/05/09
I think that rec fish havent
I think that rec fish havent really patrolled the areas properly of letting every recreational fisher know whats exactly going on , every house hold should have been sent a proper flier stating the new rules and regulations , as not everyone has the internet tvs or buys the new paper. only place i have seen it was briefly on the news for like 5 seconds n in the paper.
living is fishing
marble
Posts: 775
Date Joined: 03/09/09
Maybe the guy that
Maybe the guy that caught it didnt know the rules but surely the guys at the shop do ???
PMY 25 Centre Console DF300 Suzuki
Mossie
Posts: 106
Date Joined: 06/01/09
Mulloway arent covered by
Mulloway arent covered by this ban are they ? ?
Ryan Thipthorp (not verified)
Posts: 16
Date Joined: 01/01/70
regs!
Nope, Mulloway arent part of the ban!
As for the new regulations, i agree not alot of exposure was done "but" its up to all anglers to visit tackle stores, the Fisheries and their 24hour website to keep updated!