I attended excellent presentations by WA Fisheries and Recfishwest last night at the MAAC.  There was lots of good information and the presenters were very professional, open and honest.  A few matters of potential interest are set out below. 

It was stated that the West Coast demersal ban timing was not actually based on an analysis of the breeding cycles of the target species – I didn’t know that.    Previous Fisheries research had suggested that the total take of the nominated species needed to be reduced and the best way to achieve this was to close the fishery for a period.  There was apparently much debate about the times to do it and in the end October to December was selected.  Personally, I would have preferred January and February when it is notoriously windy but I guess that wouldn’t achieve the reduction in take as fishing pressure is probably less in those months anyway.  This is different from the area closures (such as Cockburn Sound) which are in place to protect breeding stock.  I guess when you read the Fisheries web site it does say this, but it is quite cryptic.

Seasonal closures provide additional protection for fish species that are vulnerable during times when they aggregate (group together) to reproduce. Large-scale seasonal closures are also used to reduce the total time spent fishing (referred to as ‘fishing effort’) and therefore the total number of fish captured. In the West Coast Bioregion the following seasonal closures apply……………….

There was much discussion about crayfish and diving.  I am sure we have all heard the story of the upcoming appeals court case about the diver bringing aboard more than 8 crays and not being allowed to size them and check for prohibited individuals and return the “illegal” ones.  The Fisheries position was that officers had to follow the regulations to the letter, but it was refreshing that Recfishwest was advocating for the 5-minute rule so that divers and potters were essentially on the same “playing field”.  I guess this will come down to the Judge’s opinion and all we can hope for is that common sense prevails.

There were a lot of submissions on the proposed size limit changes and in general they were supported.  Any decisions will however have to wait until after the election when the recommendations can be put to the “new” Fisheries Minister.

I asked about where the proceeds from the auction of seized boats used in the commission of the offence went.  You guessed it, consolidated revenue and not back to Fisheries.  

Recfishwest outlined its plans for more artificial reefs and was evaluating locations to service the NOR ramps next.  There will be consultation about this coming up so please give feedback when requested.  I did feel a bit sorry for Andrew Rowland as he explained the bureaucratic minefield they had to endure for every project – something I know very well.

The Recfishwest life jackets certainly look excellent.  Small, good to wear and very reasonably priced.  Information can be found here:  http://www.fishandsurvive.com.au/

All in all, a good night and well worth the time.