Minister announces demersal recreational fishing rules.

Minister announces demersal recreational fishing rules.

Minister's Media Statement http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/docs/pub/WestCoastDemersal/Media%20-%20Final%20rec%20fish%20changes.pdf

Fisheries Management Paper 231 - A Strategy For Managing The Recreational Catch Of Demersal Scalefish In The West Coast Bioregion - Decisions By The Minister For Fisheries (June 2008) http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/docs/mp/mp231/fmp231.pdf

Fisheries Research Report 177 - A 12-month survey of recreational boat-based fishing between Augusta and Kalbarri on the West Coast of Western Australia during 2005-06 (June 2008) http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/docs/frr/frr177/frr177.pdf

Recfishwest Media Statement:- http://www.recfishwest.org.au/MediaStateWestCoastRec2008.htm

Recreational fishing rules in the West Coast Bioregion:

Quote:
This package will see recreational catches of some of our most vulnerable fish species reduced by more than 50 per cent in the first 16 months.

There will be some adjustments for people to make, but the benefits of that are priceless. It means recreational fishing will become far more sustainable, ensuring a quality experience for more fishers and their families for generations to come.

Among the species to gain better protection under the package will be the so-called 'Vulnerable 5': dhufish, pink snapper, baldchin groper, breaksea cod and red snapper.

While fishing for the Vulnerable 5 species will not be allowed for a few months every year, there will be scores of other fish species that people will be able to catch along the West Coast Bioregion.

1. The daily bag limit for Category 1 fish to be reduced from seven to four fish.

2. The daily bag limit for pink snapper to be reduced from four to two fish.

3. The size limit for pink snapper to be increased from 41cm to 45cm in October, 2008 and then from 45cm to 50cm in 2010 for the metropolitan and South-West zones only (Lancelin to Augusta).

4. A boat limit of two daily bag limits of Category 1 fish to be introduced. Where five or more fishers are on board a recreational or charter boat, an additional two Category 1 fish per person (over and above the boat limit) will be allowed for the fifth and additional fishers.

5. A seasonal restriction that prohibits the take, landing and possession of the Vulnerable 5 species: dhufish, pink snapper, baldchin groper, breaksea cod and red snapper. The season will run from October 15 to December 25 in 2008, October 15 to January 31 in 2009-2010 and October 1 to January 31 for subsequent years.

6. (a) A daily bag limit of one Category 1 fish to apply to spear fishing on compressed air.
(b) The use of power assisted fishing reels to be prohibited (with exemptions for disabled fishers.

7. Discussions with fishing clubs to be initiated to discourage public fishing competitions from targeting high risk species.

8. The finfish possession limit to be reduced at the Abrolhos Islands Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Area to 10kg of fillets (or pieces of fish) or one day's bag limit of whole fish. The possession limit will remain in place for at least two years while a review to assess the option of managing the Abrolhos Islands as a 'no take away' area is undertaken.

9. A voluntary logbook program to be established for Category 1 demersal fish (ocean-bottom dwelling fish), including the Vulnerable 5 species, to provide additional catch and effort information.

10. A Recreational Trust Fund to be established to enable the recreational sector to have meaningful input into determining expenditure priorities.

11. Further research to be undertaken to investigate the appropriateness of introducing large scale fish reserves or closed areas to provide protection for large numbers of fish or over an area which is particularly important to spawning.

Funding:- The WA Government has committed $5.3million in additional research funds over the next four years to continue to monitor stocks and observe the impact of this recreational management package (in conjunction with the new commercial fishing arrangements). There will be an ongoing review of the effectiveness of these management arrangements.

An additional $7.8million has also been committed to assist in education and compliance resourcing for marine finfish fisheries in the West Coast Bioregion over the same period.


TerryF
=====
Beavering away in the background.......

Edit Corrected 4 to "fifth" 

 


Rodrat's picture

Posts: 1672

Date Joined: 13/01/07

Ha

Tue, 2008-06-24 10:55

Im all for reducing the bag limit as four cat 1 fish is more than enough. Increasing the snapper size is not good, we dont get many big ones and they should go back to breed anyway. Two is ok, plenty of fish there.
Having a ban from oct to jan is a bloody joke!
Dont they think by puting in place a ban that people will hammer those spiecies hard before the ban to make up for it.
Who is going to want to launch there boat and only be able to fish for herring, whiting or skippy?
Do they also not think about how the ban will effect peoples businesses. I reckon the sales on bait and gear will drop off huge during those months.
The ban states no landing of the specific fish, how the hell do you stop that, you dont know what you are going to catch.

It will be hard to remember most of the rules.

 

www.rockyreefmarine.com.au

____________________________________________________________________________

FISH FOR THE FUTURE

fishy fingers's picture

Posts: 1719

Date Joined: 28/04/07

Thats easy

Tue, 2008-06-24 10:42

From october 1st to january 31 every year from 2010 You cant catch them.......What a load of Bollocks
To all the virgins..............Thanks for nothing!

Dreamweaver's picture

Posts: 4688

Date Joined: 01/12/07

Hmmm.....quite a bit to take in.....heading down...

Tue, 2008-06-24 10:51

As always Terry, your (RFW) posts make interest reading!

If I understand the Augusta southern limit, all of this won't affect me - YET!  

Snapper - a 2 limit and size increases are a good thing IMO. 2 pinkies is still a good feed.

Voluntary Log Books to be introduced - don't we have that now? I use the DoF Angler's Log Book - Ocean Edition. Where's the differenc?

Looks like you guys will be heading down this way over summer - IF you can afford the petrol! 

Colin Molloy

(Colin 2 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Soon to be de "dreamweaver" ed!

Colin Hay's picture

Posts: 10407

Date Joined: 23/10/07

Interesting

Tue, 2008-06-24 11:07

Thanks for keeping us informed Terry.
(Colin 1 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

____________________________________________________________________________

Moderator. Proud member of the Fishwrecked "Old Farts". Make sure your subscribed to Fishwrecked Reeltime http://fishwrecked-reeltime.com/

Neander's picture

Posts: 520

Date Joined: 23/10/07

I still think marine parks

Tue, 2008-06-24 11:42

I still think marine parks would be a better way to help restock rather than total bans.

When the bans lifted people will catch what ever they can, a marine park would be safe from fishers forever.

Dreamweaver's picture

Posts: 4688

Date Joined: 01/12/07

dead by-catch floating around on the surface

Tue, 2008-06-24 12:22

  With so many throw back for so many reasons (limit, size, season), the need for education and correct fish handling and release is now going to be more imperative than ever.

Will the 'abalone factor' transfer to fishing on the first day(s) after the opening of the 'V5 closed season'?

Will those with smaller vessells and lesser freeboard that would pick their days have desire overway caution when the V5 closed season closes?

How inventive will fishos become at concealing V5 catches during the closed season? 

Colin Molloy

(Colin 2 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Soon to be de "dreamweaver" ed!

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

customers pov in retail

Tue, 2008-06-24 12:35

we have had alot of mixed emotions on these new rules and regulations and surprising to us most of the dhuie fisherman support the goverment decisions . they also seem to make a point of " it is only 3 months and if we dont accept this then in 2 years time it will become a total bann as the fish will become a protected species" fair call i think and as a retailer and very keen dhuie fisherman my self i have pulled my head around the decisions that have been made and have decided it is for the best. just my opinion any way.
brenz


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



The Tackle shack, for all your fishing needs
huge range of stock to suit any fisherperson.
PH:9248 3800

fishy fingers's picture

Posts: 1719

Date Joined: 28/04/07

4 months

Tue, 2008-06-24 17:17

From 2010 onwards
To all the virgins..............Thanks for nothing!

Colin Hay's picture

Posts: 10407

Date Joined: 23/10/07

A couple of other interesting points

Tue, 2008-06-24 12:55

1) Discussions with fishing clubs to be initiated to discourage public fishing competitions from targeting high risk species. I wondre if they will contact Fishwrecked?

The finfish possession limit to be reduced at the Abrolhos Islands Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Area to 10kg of fillets (or pieces of fish) or one day’s bag limit of whole fish. The possession limit will remain in place for at least two years while a review to assess the option of managing the Abrolhos Islands as a ‘no take away’ area is undertaken.
You would think this is going to have a big affet on charter operators.

(Colin 1 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

____________________________________________________________________________

Moderator. Proud member of the Fishwrecked "Old Farts". Make sure your subscribed to Fishwrecked Reeltime http://fishwrecked-reeltime.com/

mako magic's picture

Posts: 5785

Date Joined: 03/08/05

eventually putting the ban

Tue, 2008-06-24 12:55

eventually putting the ban to 4 months of the yeah is imo a bit of an overkill, thats hitting the peak holiday times for people, alot of kids love to go fishing on school holidays, whats it going to be like when you say no sorry mate we can only catch small fish and no dhuies or anything, look at the whiting grounds out from rockingham, there has been many good dhuies caught from there, and i think we will see alot still caught and alot go back dead,

I store my boat and pay $195 a month, so eventually i will be paying $780 a year just to keep my FISHING boat there when i can't use it for the reason i got it, not fair i think, i agree big time on reduced bag limits but no way on the closed season, thats just totally unfair and its far from going to stop the 5 listed species getting caught.

looks like the sharks of this season are going to get bigger and bigger each year now, soon we might even see some 300 fotters of the coast, all the dead dhuies blackass reds etc floating around out there, they will be loving it

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

there are 100s of

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:02

there are 100s of different species in the water that anglers choose to target. the turn over will change for those 3 months but when the season re opens you will make up that lost money any way. i also think that anglers will choose to target other species in those "off months" wich will pick up the money in different areas e.g jigging, squidding and lets not forget the closure time is just right for metro mackie season tuna etc wich will pick up bluewater lure sales , lets focus on the the future not the pressent . i would love to hear a bit of feed back on what you would do if we wiped out the species alltogether ? although you could look on the bright side if we wipe em out we wouldnt need a close season then would we!!!
brenz


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



The Tackle shack, for all your fishing needs
huge range of stock to suit any fisherperson.
PH:9248 3800

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

i 100% agree that the

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:06

i 100% agree that the closure time is very very wrong as it will ruin it for the youth of today . they should move it back a month so it finishes dec 31. but something has to be done.
brenz


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



The Tackle shack, for all your fishing needs
huge range of stock to suit any fisherperson.
PH:9248 3800

Dreamweaver's picture

Posts: 4688

Date Joined: 01/12/07

Lots of feelings and impacts

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:14

Feelings will be running high amongst these issues, now, and a for a very long time.

1) Closed V5 Seasons - I personally agree with Brenz, let's face it, as absolutely unpalatable as this is (will be), governments will go for a solution that is easiest and causes the least political damage, whilst still being seen to be doing something that will apease, to some extent, all (most) stakeholders. Put all that together and the only alternative I see is either total bans (more floaters and conceaments!) or marine parks. Yes, I know, being told 'we can't do something' goes against the grain of the whole Australian ethos.

2) West Coast Bioregion (WCBR), notwithstanding the 'micro' considerations of specific areas (Abhrolis for example), I can't understand why the 'South Coast' bioregion (east of Augusta) has not been targetted in the same way as the sub 26 degree parallel west coat boa region? Surely, the V5 closure season will see a marked influx in fishos heading down outside the WCBR - this in turn will put pressures on fish stocks and fisheries down here. A consistent approach is required otherwise, to some extent, you are just shifting the problem. (Notwithstanding the WCBR benefits).

3) Fishing Clubs - I seem to recall that 225 and 228 initially talked about discouraging fishing comps altogether? (May be wrong). Either way, the sustainment of the comps (popular) with education against C1/V5 captures (presumably via a discouraging points system, et al zero) is a good strategic move.

4) Log Books - as I said, don't we have voluntary (non cat, but species listed) log books now - shouldn't these be made compulsory? DATA DATA DATA!

 

 

Colin Molloy

(Colin 2 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Soon to be de "dreamweaver" ed!

SHizz's picture

Posts: 1556

Date Joined: 07/08/05

so in other words, after all

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:18

so in other words, after all the submissions, they still wont budge on any aspect? righto, well that was pointless.

Andy Mac's picture

Posts: 4778

Date Joined: 03/02/06

Prediction

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:19


Day one of open season and there will be a few guys fishing with dab nets looking for the big floaters.Frown
Seriously however...
I think we need a major paradigm shift here and I for one will be honing my Tailor fishing skills and other inshore activities during the closed season instead of trying my luck in avoiding the Dhuies out wide and risk inadvertantly continuing the fish kill.
From that perspective it might mean more money for the tackle stores as I now have to have a much wider variety of specialist tackle on my boat so that I can still enjoy the passtime of fishing without risking the capture of these vulnerable 5 species during that time.
Same goes for fishing deeper, you may need completely different gear to do it.
 nobody is stopping us going fishing. So I think once boat fishing is in your blood you will find other species to target. The Bream Tournaments and Bream fishing in general will get a big boost from this I think as a few guys start to diversify.
The obvious issue is the bigger boats that suit offshore fishing will head wider, the mid size boats will fish closer. The smaller boats will still fish inshore and head into the river.
One more prediction, I will nail a big Metro Spanish Mackerel, a big YFT and a heap of salmon in 2009. (I guess that's because I will be doing more surface work than bottom bouncing)Wink
Adapt to the circumstances guys, and enjoy your passtime. There is no use whinging about it now as its a done deal.
So what will you be targetting in the closed season?

Cheers

Andy Mac

____________________________________________________________________________

Cheers

Andy Mac (Fishwrecked Reeltime Editor & Forum Moderator)

Youngest member of the Fishwrecked Old Farts Club

Andy Mac's picture

Posts: 4778

Date Joined: 03/02/06

Im not going to ask what sort of tackle you need for that

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:26


Or I might have to delete my own posts Wink

Cheers

Andy Mac

____________________________________________________________________________

Cheers

Andy Mac (Fishwrecked Reeltime Editor & Forum Moderator)

Youngest member of the Fishwrecked Old Farts Club

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

i my self have no probs

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:30

i my self have no probs with pullin my quota of dhuies every time but lets think of the less fortunate pple who have been succesfull enough to get 1 ,this is doing far more damage to the retail game than a closure will . when people come to me to go dhuie fishing buy all this wizz bang gear go fish it and come back to tell me they didnt get a fsh they are disshartened and reluctant to go for those species again wich then reflects on us as a retailer. ok so then it is in my best interests to give away a couple of spots to ensure they catch fish , fair enoough then they tell there mates and there for no dhuies for me so it is a loose loose situation for us. so if we support these closures thenmaybe the 3 mile will start firing again and all the other common places will also produce there for making a happy customer and happy retailer.
brenz


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



The Tackle shack, for all your fishing needs
huge range of stock to suit any fisherperson.
PH:9248 3800

mako magic's picture

Posts: 5785

Date Joined: 03/08/05

big feed

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:30

5. A seasonal restriction that prohibits the take, landing and possession of the Vulnerable 5 species: dhufish, pink snapper, baldchin groper, breaksea cod and red snapper. The season will run from October 15 to December 25 in 2008, October 15 to January 31 in 2009-2010 and October 1 to January 31 for subsequent years.

 

 

well since we can't have in our possession any of the cat 1 fish, looks like some big bbq's at the start of oct this year

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

what are you worried about

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:35

what are you worried about any way shizz you cant catch duies to save ya life hahaha:)
brenz


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



The Tackle shack, for all your fishing needs
huge range of stock to suit any fisherperson.
PH:9248 3800

Andy Mac's picture

Posts: 4778

Date Joined: 03/02/06

Fishwrecked Community BBQ

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:37

Mako I think that;s the basis for a great community event.
We could get all the fishwrecked members to donate their vulnerable 5 freezer remnants to a big BBQ for a charity group like Canteen or something.
Would be good to give something back to the community.
What do you think?



Cheers

Andy Mac

____________________________________________________________________________

Cheers

Andy Mac (Fishwrecked Reeltime Editor & Forum Moderator)

Youngest member of the Fishwrecked Old Farts Club

mako magic's picture

Posts: 5785

Date Joined: 03/08/05

wonder wheter they will

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:43

wonder wheter they will rethink it when every weekend during the ban people put up reports like this below

 

Fished my whiting grounds out from rocko today in 30-40 m, kept 6 nice big kg's, also caught 6 big dhuies, all released , but all floated away to die, i can see where the conservation side of it is going, NOT

 

this will happen and more than they think

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

if they supply release

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:46

if they supply release weights to the rec anglers then this whole strategy might become more feasable

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

The Tackle shack, for all your fishing needs huge range of stock to suit any fisherperson. PH:9248 3800

mako magic's picture

Posts: 5785

Date Joined: 03/08/05

was talking to paul and i

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:49

was talking to paul and i mentioned that, though would expect the gov would still expect you to pay for them, i believe if they were fair dinkum about conserving, every registered boat owner should be given one free of charge and show they are all for it

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

release weights

Tue, 2008-06-24 13:51

thats right how can the government expect fishoes to take this seriously if they can invest a miniture part of tax payes money to help with the rules they have created
brenz

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

The Tackle shack, for all your fishing needs huge range of stock to suit any fisherperson. PH:9248 3800

Dreamweaver's picture

Posts: 4688

Date Joined: 01/12/07

Release weights

Tue, 2008-06-24 14:03

We know that the release (no pun intended) of RFW's Release Weight DVD is imminent - we just need to weight (no pun intended #2) for it. But I totally agree, given the that correct release of baratrauma'd dismersal species will be even more imperative - not only should they be free, but they should be compulsory - along with all your other 'safety' gear. Actually, if the government is serious about these conservation moves, I see that they have no option.

I'd rather see them compulsory rather than just free.

It's the only way to minimise the number of floaters (along with education of course).

So make them free, then a massive multi media campaign. This too, is where 'salt water rec licences' would allow targetted mail outs.

 

Colin Molloy

(Colin 2 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Soon to be de "dreamweaver" ed!

Scott Bateman's picture

Posts: 46

Date Joined: 06/05/08

Surley possesion doesn't

Tue, 2008-06-24 14:03

Surley possesion doesn't mean what's allready in your freezer??? Correct me if i'm wrong but that's bloody ridiculous if thats what it means!!!!

fishy fingers's picture

Posts: 1719

Date Joined: 28/04/07

IT DO I'M AFRAID

Tue, 2008-06-24 17:28



To all the virgins..............Thanks for nothing!

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

no scott it does not include

Tue, 2008-06-24 14:07

no scott it does not include freezer stock just boat possesion limit .
brenz

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

The Tackle shack, for all your fishing needs huge range of stock to suit any fisherperson. PH:9248 3800

fishy fingers's picture

Posts: 1719

Date Joined: 28/04/07

I thoght

Tue, 2008-06-24 17:30

The possesion limits did include your freezer at home Have they changed this?...I havent read the details

To all the virgins..............Thanks for nothing!

Scott Bateman's picture

Posts: 46

Date Joined: 06/05/08

Thats allright then....Well

Tue, 2008-06-24 14:13

Thats allright then....Well I know that Bunbury needs some time to recoup it's losses.

uncle's picture

Posts: 9504

Date Joined: 10/02/07

limits

Tue, 2008-06-24 14:16

it maybe a conspiracy,they reakon we wont be able to afford the fuel so bring in the limits.
Fast fish rule!

____________________________________________________________________________

all aggressive fish love bigjohnsjigs

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

i couldnt agree more

Tue, 2008-06-24 14:39

i couldnt agree more with you about the pros it is100% bullsh!t that they can still fish whilst the rrecreational angler cant . but you got to remember this is politics the highest bidder will always win and whilst the pros are paying huge money to the goverment to fish there is nothing we can do. they are thinking of there pockets not anything else but whist the pros are fishing this is the only way to preserve our stocks. you are also right that it shouldnt reflect on us if they cant find fish but it does ... welcome to retail!
brenz


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



The Tackle shack, for all your fishing needs
huge range of stock to suit any fisherperson.
PH:9248 3800

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

outa curiosity does any 1

Tue, 2008-06-24 14:58

outa curiosity does any 1 dissagree with the tailor bag limits?
brenz

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

The Tackle shack, for all your fishing needs huge range of stock to suit any fisherperson. PH:9248 3800

Posts: 241

Date Joined: 30/10/05

we have jackasses in power

Tue, 2008-06-24 17:16

what a joke the ban is so much overkill. i dont disagree with the reuction of bag limits or size increase but come on puting a ban on the fish for three months will see people going out and getting bag loads of other fish (will thye become banned too) John Ford whats going on in your head. as the paper said the other day its between 45and 55 bucks a kilo for snapper. im not going to pay that that is why i go fishing, plus the enjoyment. grrrr D$%ks in parliment need a good kick in the butt

(just my opinion and im angry as)

riddlez's picture

Posts: 13

Date Joined: 11/03/08

fish hard or go home just as

Tue, 2008-06-24 17:27

fish hard or go home just as well i didnt sell my barra boat gona need it

tommo77's picture

Posts: 461

Date Joined: 20/06/08

i dont understand

Tue, 2008-06-24 17:54

'looks like the sharks of this season are going to get bigger and bigger each year now, soon we might even see some 300 fotters of the coast, all the dead dhuies blackass reds etc floating around out there, they will be loving it'

 

why will there be so many dead fish?

i dont go fishing on boats but is that because when they bring the fish up it will die from the pressure? excuse my ignorance

Dean's picture

Posts: 1943

Date Joined: 23/02/07

Yeah the pressure change can

Tue, 2008-06-24 17:59

Yeah the pressure change can kill the fish as they get barotrauma

Dreamweaver's picture

Posts: 4688

Date Joined: 01/12/07

Tommo....floaters

Tue, 2008-06-24 18:29

A lot of species that are caught from a boat, if to be released successfully, require various types of special care and correct release technique.

A lot of species that are pulled from water of any depth suffer in varying ways from barratrauma - the delitarious effect extracting (retreiving) a fish from deep in the water column (where they are under greater atmospheric pressure equivalent) to thw surface - which is less pressure. Like a diver asscending too quick. This requires correct use of a release weight, or similar mechanism.

Additionally, if fish are handled poorly (unsupported, dry hands, dry sunny surface etc) they can die. Or if 'swum' incorrectly even.

So the seasonal West Coast Bioregion preclusion of the 'Valuable 5/Cat 1' catch retension will mean more fish will be released, more potentially, ny inexperienced boat fishos, hence more floaters.

 

 

 

Colin Molloy

(Colin 2 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Soon to be de "dreamweaver" ed!

Rodrat's picture

Posts: 1672

Date Joined: 13/01/07

Question

Tue, 2008-06-24 18:28

I am a little confused after watching the news.
Does all the rules apply from just kalbarri south?
The cat 1 fish being decreased from 7 a day to 4.
Is that just kalbarri south or all of w/a?

 

www.rockyreefmarine.com.au

____________________________________________________________________________

FISH FOR THE FUTURE

Auslobster's picture

Posts: 1901

Date Joined: 03/05/08

These arguments about how

Tue, 2008-06-24 18:33

These arguments about how young people won't get into fishing because of the V5 seasonal bans are somewhat ridiculous, don't you think? How many of us started fishing as small kids, catching dhuies and snapper? I'm quite happy with the ban during school holidays. Remember, January is a snapper breeding month, and not just in Cockburn/Warnbro Sounds. They are quite easily caught during that time at places like the Five Fathom Bank as well. While they're breeding!

If you bought a boat just to catch a feed of dhufish/snapper, wouldn't it have been cheaper just to buy the fish instead? Think beyond the heavy sinkers/lumps of octopus/20 mile runs offshore....if you're in it for something other than a feed, try a bit of trolling or maybe some light tackle fishing with soft plastics on the back of the reef. There's more to fishing than just hauling up meat.

As far as "floaters" go, the number of people going out there is going to be heavily reduced during the ban. When the ban begins this October, I can't see myself burning up 100 litres of petrol at $2 a litre (or more) trying to catch a banded sweep or a sargeant baker.

This is something that needed to be done, the government's only mistake (and not just THIS government) is that they left it to long to do anything about it.

Faulkner Family's picture

Posts: 18079

Date Joined: 11/03/08

couldnt

Tue, 2008-06-24 20:13

agree more,as you said try something else. my family enjoy just getting out on the water ,sure its nice to get a good feed but people have got to just enjoy it out there ,have some fun with light gear on some big skippy or to that affect there is a lot of other fish to fry other than dhuis that taste just as good.

RUSS

 

"A family that fishes together stays together"

____________________________________________________________________________

RUSS and SANDY. A family that fishes together stays together

Posts: 236

Date Joined: 04/06/07

I think it would have worked

Tue, 2008-06-24 18:40

I think it would have worked better if they shortend the closure time and put a complete ban on bottom fishing then Barotrauma wouldn't be an issue. Maybe spread the months out a bit more or even no fishing first week of every month? this would be easier for the fishing/boating industry to survive rather than such a large period of time with reduced profits. Main thing that concerns me the 4 month ban could be in forever once in place. Alot of these new fishing regs are based on very little scientific evidence and alot of guess work. What will be different  in the future? will they do another creel survey and times it by the amount of Rec boats again? It would be good to know how they will measure if these new regs have been a big success or not. It will be interesing to see if in the near future we start noticing more fish and larger sizes?

Will be entertaining seeing all the boats at the ramp the first good day after the closure, get down there early. LOL, Ramp Rage!

Rodrat's picture

Posts: 1672

Date Joined: 13/01/07

Really is a joke

Tue, 2008-06-24 18:43

How do these people making the rules know how many fish are out there? Does john ford go fishing?

 

www.rockyreefmarine.com.au

____________________________________________________________________________

FISH FOR THE FUTURE

Dreamweaver's picture

Posts: 4688

Date Joined: 01/12/07

Rod, let me respond this way

Tue, 2008-06-24 19:35

It was in response to Oz's post in FWA:

Remember folks this IS about the West Coast Bioregion, not the whole of WA.

I'm certainly for conservation, fish for the future etc. However, I'm yet to be convinced that there is unempirical data.

We can't stock take demersal (aside from roving palegics) - so how do we judge depletion?

Even the process of accurately measuring depletion is at best, difficult, at worst, nigh on impossible.

The have been extrapolated kreel surveys undertaken. (I've yet to read the complete 2005-6 survey promulgated by RFW) , the only option is compulsory log books.

Bet let's pull up a chair and examine this closely.

Recently, as a concerned (and, I hope somewhat enlightened boat fisho) I approached DoF (Dept of Fisheries, and subsequently secured their 'Angler's Log Book' (Ocean Edition).

To achieve an exhaustive, accurate (and therefore incontestable) extraction analysis, you would have to honestly record your catch and then have it subject to QA by fisheries officers at the point of landing - verified to your actual catch. Obviously, a resource impossible task.

Then this Fishery Officer verification would need to be communicated to the DoF research dept.

It's a difficult prospect for sure.

Some anglers, to some degree, understandably, will catch tons of V5/Cat 1 fish over and over again, and say there is no depletion and the existing fishing right and 'ethos' can continue. But does that prove that stocks are healthy or being depleted?

Colin Molloy

(Colin 2 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Soon to be de "dreamweaver" ed!

fishy fingers's picture

Posts: 1719

Date Joined: 28/04/07

Rodrat

Tue, 2008-06-24 20:19

I think what Colin 2 is trying to say is they have no idea what the stocks are and never will probably Wink

To all the virgins..............Thanks for nothing!

Dreamweaver's picture

Posts: 4688

Date Joined: 01/12/07

Almost FF

Thu, 2008-06-26 07:37

You almost got there FF - I'm saying that, in addition to not knowing stocks, it IMO be almost impossible to put in place a system that ensures the accurate recording of all captures. Wink 

Colin Molloy

(Colin 2 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Soon to be de "dreamweaver" ed!

Posts: 236

Date Joined: 04/06/07

They don't, He doesn't

Tue, 2008-06-24 18:46

They don't, He doesn't

Paul G's picture

Posts: 5215

Date Joined: 12/12/07

Raise the size limits of all

Tue, 2008-06-24 19:17

Raise the size limits of all cat one fish only one dhuie per person ;more marine parks ,"CLOSURE   i'll give them some floaters

____________________________________________________________________________

Active Gyp-Rok solutions ,Residential  and commercial ceilings and walls

mako magic's picture

Posts: 5785

Date Joined: 03/08/05

yeah as we spoke about paul,

Tue, 2008-06-24 19:20

yeah as we spoke about paul, put dhuies to 60cm pinks to 50, raise them all by 5cm or 10cm, that would be fair and reasonable marine parks, not full closure of cockburn sound geo bay etc, dont think too many people would object, funny how its still 2 dhuies though but lowered snapper, especially considering dhuies are really only found in wa, but snapper are all over the lower part of australia

tommo77's picture

Posts: 461

Date Joined: 20/06/08

yeah i dont have a boat LOL

Tue, 2008-06-24 19:23

what i meant to say is 'i have never been fishing on a boat'

 im sure its awesome.

 thanks for that i was just wondering

Paul G's picture

Posts: 5215

Date Joined: 12/12/07

Is this a total ban or only

Tue, 2008-06-24 19:23

Is this a total ban or only between lano and agusta

____________________________________________________________________________

Active Gyp-Rok solutions ,Residential  and commercial ceilings and walls

Dreamweaver's picture

Posts: 4688

Date Joined: 01/12/07

Paul - WCB

Tue, 2008-06-24 19:49

West Coat Bioregion - here's a map:

 

Colin Molloy

(Colin 2 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Soon to be de "dreamweaver" ed!

Posts: 236

Date Joined: 04/06/07

Kalbarri to Augusta

Tue, 2008-06-24 19:26

Kalbarri to Augusta

Paul G's picture

Posts: 5215

Date Joined: 12/12/07

Well i think a lot more

Tue, 2008-06-24 19:37

Well i think a lot more people will go out of there way to break the ban .Plenty break the rules now, on bag limits and size limits,there's no fisheries on the ramp so who's going to stop them. I for one will head out deeper, and target other fish, and hope i don't catch to many cat one fish in the prosess .it really shits me that i am even thinking this way, after years of releasing large amounts of fish to make sure there is still fish for the future.but i draw the line at some pollie telling me i can't enjoy my hobbie the way i want to, im a deep sea bottom bouncer, not a whiting herring fisho. Thats all from me, on this f#^&*% topic.....

____________________________________________________________________________

Active Gyp-Rok solutions ,Residential  and commercial ceilings and walls

Posts: 241

Date Joined: 30/10/05

how long

Tue, 2008-06-24 19:47

how long will it be befor the guys trolling up surface fish get the same action the bottom bouncers are facing now. i didnt buy y boat just for the meat  but it is how ever a nice plus to be able to enjoy some nice tasting fish after the efforts put in. I myself enjoy jigging around the little lumps, more often than not its a smabo i pull up but every now and then it will be a dhuie or a pinkie. now i have to release them. coe in closer and get a feed of whiting or skippy that is until they then become threatened and then it will be none at all. can anyone answer why the closure this year is till december 25th then the next years will be 31st of january. why not juts make it all the same.i juts hate to see how much an impact it has on everyth else not just fishing but the people affected in other areas of this. but why is it that the dhuies are still at 2 per person and not reduced compared to snapper doesnt make sense.

Posts: 236

Date Joined: 04/06/07

I would have liked to have

Tue, 2008-06-24 20:02

I would have liked to have seen the V5 seperated from the other CAT1 fish, the reason given by minister is it would be too confusing for anglers to understand the bag limit, 4 V5 and 3 CAT1 = Bag limit 7, I'm so confused!!! We can't fish we can't count LOL!

Faulkner Family's picture

Posts: 18079

Date Joined: 11/03/08

my anderstanding

Tue, 2008-06-24 20:24

is the cat one bag limit is now 4 when they open up the ban on v5 again it still stays at 4 cat one,if you fish 2 pple on your boat you can catch 8 cat one if you fish 4 you can catch 16 cat 1 if you fish 5 you can get 9 cat one,is that way it works ?????

RUSS

 

"A family that fishes together stays together"

____________________________________________________________________________

RUSS and SANDY. A family that fishes together stays together

Rodrat's picture

Posts: 1672

Date Joined: 13/01/07

Errrr

Tue, 2008-06-24 20:30

Im pretty sure its a 2bag limit per boat regardless of wether you have two or four on the boat. Max 8 cat 1 fish per boat.

 

www.rockyreefmarine.com.au

____________________________________________________________________________

FISH FOR THE FUTURE

mako magic's picture

Posts: 5785

Date Joined: 03/08/05

4. A boat limit of two daily

Tue, 2008-06-24 20:32

4. A boat limit of two daily bag limits of Category 1 fish to be introduced. Where five or more fishers are on board a recreational or charter boat, an additional two Category 1 fish per person (over and above the boat limit) will be allowed for the fifth and additional fishers.

 

From that russ i would take it that with 4 people you are still only allowed 8 cat 1 fish, but i maybe mistaken and read it wrong, it would only change after there is 5 or more people on the boat

Faulkner Family's picture

Posts: 18079

Date Joined: 11/03/08

no probs

Tue, 2008-06-24 20:38

when sndy and i went through it we might have read it wrong ,as they say s#@t happens.will probably go yhrough it again tomorrow.not that we ever catch that many anyway :( .sandy has better chance than me :(

RUSS

 

"A family that fishes together stays together"

____________________________________________________________________________

RUSS and SANDY. A family that fishes together stays together

mako magic's picture

Posts: 5785

Date Joined: 03/08/05

going to be a big race on

Tue, 2008-06-24 20:40

going to be a big race on comp day to see who gets the fish first as if its the 3 of you, you can only catch 8 still, someones not going to be happy LOL

Faulkner Family's picture

Posts: 18079

Date Joined: 11/03/08

we dont

Tue, 2008-06-24 20:46

have that prob,i cant catch the buggers ,brenden sleeps all day .so that leaves sandy and nathan to catch them all."lol"

RUSS

 

"A family that fishes together stays together"

____________________________________________________________________________

RUSS and SANDY. A family that fishes together stays together

Colin Hay's picture

Posts: 10407

Date Joined: 23/10/07

I suggest that people write of their concerns in a clear and

Tue, 2008-06-24 20:13

concise manner to the letters to the editors pages of the West Australian, the Sunday Times and your local papers. There is an election coming and it is time to tell the Minister what you think as it appears he didn't listen too closely to concerns raised by rec fishermen previously.
Nothing concerns a pollie more than disgruntled voters airing there voices in the public arena when an election is coming.
(Colin 1 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

____________________________________________________________________________

Moderator. Proud member of the Fishwrecked "Old Farts". Make sure your subscribed to Fishwrecked Reeltime http://fishwrecked-reeltime.com/

diji's picture

Posts: 404

Date Joined: 31/03/07

John ford is getting paid by the pro's

Tue, 2008-06-24 20:32

What do you guys expect, how much do you think we will be paying for fresh fish for Xmas.i dont mind a ban but for F#*K sake open it a week before Xmas and ban the pro's as well.this is just another one of WA fisheries knee jerk reactions like the crabs let the pro's wreck it and make the rec's pay.
I cant even get some crabs for chrissy now but i bet the pro's will have some excemption how much will they be as well.
West coast bioregion just for now, next year the whole state
Why do you guys think they did the pro's first,

Sorry but no red shirts they can get a job on one of the pro boats

diji's picture

Posts: 404

Date Joined: 31/03/07

Release weights r they carried by the pro's

Tue, 2008-06-24 20:41

I dont think so just throw them over haven't got time

I'll give the minister a log book a special log book> still steaming.Lol!

SPESS's picture

Posts: 3356

Date Joined: 29/12/06

U know whats the worst

Tue, 2008-06-24 21:03

U know whats the worst thing...........? Knowing you cant do f#*k all about it! Thats my comment and i agree with most comments written this can go on for days and wont achieve jack now that pisses me but i suppose just like evryone else where going to have to deal with it. Suxs asre hey.



Keep it tight, reeeeeeel tight!



*****RECFISH MEMBER*****

Faulkner Family's picture

Posts: 18079

Date Joined: 11/03/08

thats right

Tue, 2008-06-24 21:08

the new regs are here to stay i think so we just have to grin and bear it ,no amount of complaining will change it.the key word is diversify.

RUSS

 

"A family that fishes together stays together"

____________________________________________________________________________

RUSS and SANDY. A family that fishes together stays together

ROCKPOM's picture

Posts: 629

Date Joined: 23/04/07

As I said once before ..Once

Wed, 2008-06-25 00:10

As I said once before ..Once closed it will never open again!!!

We gave them the inch and they took a mile!! A--holes...

Help the guys out with research and get shat on......

mitch's picture

Posts: 1285

Date Joined: 14/08/05

bloody hell.this is not good

Wed, 2008-06-25 08:03

bloody hell.this is not good .no no no .i hope things are worked out a bit better and fairer in the near future .dont know how .maybee one week ya can one week ya cant and maybee an extra couple of weeks of it .but a total ban is just f$%ken absurd.ford just lost my vote
always in it just the depth that varies

BQ544's picture

Posts: 361

Date Joined: 22/10/06

I for one thought

Wed, 2008-06-25 09:08

I for one thought spearfishing on scuba was definitely going to be banned..... But very happy to see we go a reprieve. But looks like we won't be able to get our one nice fish with our eight crays till after Christmas.

I guess the decision now is go south below Augusta or north to Sharkbay during that time. Someone needs to put togeather a comparison of the last 5 years of winds from Oct 15 to Dec 25 in Augusta and Sharkbay. That way we can plan our trips. Either way north or south, if you are prepared to drive at night you can be fishing in the morning.

As far as charters go, I think if they target deep water fish, say 150 to 300 metres deep they may pick up new customers that have boats who normally wouldn't be comfortable traveling out that far. 

I also think as a spinoff, the goverment should have removed road tax off our boat fuel. The fishing community missed a good chance during the discussion time.

At the end of the day, I think the result will be a lot less fisherman and boats, 99% of the small private fishing shops shutting down, ally boat sales dropping off with some small manufacturers closing down, a further increase in the closure above Kalbarri and fishing, like hunting becomeing something of the past for the next generation.

fishy fingers's picture

Posts: 1719

Date Joined: 28/04/07

BQ544

Wed, 2008-06-25 14:47

"As far as charters go, I think if they target deep water fish, say 150 to 300 metres deep they may pick up new customers that have boats who normally wouldn't be comfortable traveling out that far."

I think the problem there is if they have to start going a lot further to deeper water they are going to be increasing their prices because of the rising fuel costs therefore losing customers who think that the current prices are a bit steep anyway...I think the charters are on a slipery slope down!

all the virgins..............Thanks for nothing!

Posts: 441

Date Joined: 10/06/06

Quality Fish Ban

Sat, 2008-06-28 13:31

Get out there people and fill your freezers full of quality fish before the 3 month ban thats what I'll be doing,stuff'm.

Kev

FISHING IS MY ADDICTION

Maverick's picture

Posts: 1260

Date Joined: 06/06/06

Sorry Russ

Sat, 2008-06-28 15:05

 

the new regs are here to stay i think so we just have to grin and bear it ,no amount of complaining will change it.the key word is diversify.

RUSS

I have to dissagree with ya on this , if we just sit back and accept this without a fight then whats for them to bring in harsher restrictions later with no data to show for it , they will say to themselves they took the last lot without a fight lets rip them a new ar$ehole as they didn't mind the last one we gave them.

we have to let them know that this sucks , no data to show for all this , we get a rec only area and then without any further research they dole out this crap after all the submissions on this , well maybe I was the only one who said this closure $hit shouldn't fly .

 

JMHO on this crapfest the govt is shoving down our throat .

________________________________________________________________________

 Oatsfishwest member 88 .

____________________________________________________________________________

 

 OFW member 088 

 Sponsored by no one and I work for myself so my comments are my own.

ROCKPOM's picture

Posts: 629

Date Joined: 23/04/07

I heard a rumour of a good

Sat, 2008-06-28 16:48

I heard a rumour of a good protest idea

Get 100 to 300 boats towed into Perth during peak hour and all try to find parking spots around parliment house as its not against the law to tow a boat.

Hang some placards on the boats for advertising

Anyone interested???

Dreamweaver's picture

Posts: 4688

Date Joined: 01/12/07

Terry - Paper 231 - Seasonal Restrictions???

Mon, 2008-06-30 12:02

Terry, would appreciate clarification/interpretation on this please (appreciating it's the Minister's paper administered by DoF):

'The seasonal restriction will prohibit the take, landing and possession of the “vulnerable 5” pecies; dhufish, pink snapper, baldchin groper, breaksea cod and red snapper/bight redfish. '

If I interpret that litterally, you are not allowed to catch (take) V5s. Perhaps that should have read INTENTIONALLY take. If you fish for other non V5 dmersels in the WCB (during the 'closed season'), then V5 bycatch is likely, which means that, if that section of 231 is interpreted litterally, you'd be breaking the law?

I may be interpreting this too literally, but the wording doesn't give me any other conclusions.  

Colin Molloy

(Colin 2 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Soon to be de "dreamweaver" ed!

Posts: 489

Date Joined: 11/08/05

Take of fish during seasonal restrictions

Mon, 2008-06-30 13:08

Colin



Here are somne extracts from the Fish Resources Management Act. http://www.slp.wa.gov.au/legislation/statutes.nsf/main_mrtitle_345_homepage.html



Quote:
"take", in relation to fish, includes catch, capture, entrap, enclose, gather, remove, poison, stun, kill or destroy fish by any means;



"protected fish" means —

(a) commercially protected fish; or

(b) totally protected fish;



45. Class of fish may be prescribed to be protected fish

(1) A class of fish may be prescribed to be —

(a) totally protected fish; or

(b) commercially protected fish,

for the purposes of this Act.

(2) A class of fish may be defined for the purposes of subsection (1) by reference to all or any of the following —

(a) a species or type of fish;

(b) a description of fish by reference to sex, size, weight, reproductive cycle or any other characteristic;

(c) an area of land or waters from which the fish are taken;

(d) a period of time during which the fish is taken;

(e) any other factor.



46. Totally protected fish

A person must not —

(a) take;

(b) have in the person’s possession;

(c) sell or purchase;

(d) consign; or

(e) bring into the State or into WA waters,

any totally protected fish.

Penalty: As provided in sections 52 and 222.



47. Commercially protected fish

A person must not —

(a) take for the purpose of sale;

(b) have in the person’s possession for the purpose of sale;

(c) process for the purpose of sale;

(d) consign; or

(e) sell or purchase,

any commercially protected fish.

Penalty: As provided in sections 52 and 222.



48. Defences



It is a defence in proceedings for an offence against section 46 or 47 for the person charged to prove —



(a) in the case of an offence relating to the taking of protected fish, that on becoming aware of the taking of the fish, the person took immediate steps to return the fish to its natural environment with the least possible injury;



(c) that the person has any other defence prescribed in the regulations.



So.... "Commercially protected" - stops commercial take



"Totally protected" - stops ANY and ALL take (exceptions allowed for research)



It will be interesting to see how they write the Regulations to have the vulnerable 5 "Recreationally protected" eg stop recreational take but still allow commercial take when the Act doesn't (seem to) include that option. Don't ask me, watch for the Regulations.



Also interesting reference Release Weight discussions:- In the defence to "taking," there is that requirement to "return the fish to its natural environment with the least possible injury"....



I wonder if letting a fish wallow around on the surface is actually "returning the fish to its natural environment..." which is at depth.????



All sorts of interesting question come up from these extracts. People need to do the right thing or consult a lawyer.



TerryF

=====

Beavering away in the background.......

Dreamweaver's picture

Posts: 4688

Date Joined: 01/12/07

Thanks heaps Terry!! Also Interesting

Mon, 2008-06-30 13:49

That's exactly what I was looking for - (Sec 48) - Defence - that's the sought of stuff that needs promulgation. 

Also interesting reference Release Weight discussions:- In the defence to "taking," there is that requirement to "return the fish to its natural environment with the least possible injury"....

Whilst appreciating that the 'jury verdict' (public commentary) is not unanimous on the effectiveness of release weights, I would say the inevitable bycatch of V5s and the only (horribly visible) alternative is release weights and that they should be made compulsory.

People need to do the right thing or consult a lawyer.

Maybe consult a lawyer AND (then) do the right thing.

As an Interesting adjunct, one of the Albany local papers posted the Minister's statement, more than inferring that the V5 closure applies down here. Of course, as we know, it applied to the WCB only and NOT (yet anyway), the south coast. I'll be writing to them to clarify that. Obviously, that's why you didn't post any of this on the Southcoast forum. 

Thanks again Terry! 

 

Colin Molloy

(Colin 2 - Co-founding member of the prestigious Colin Club)

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Soon to be de "dreamweaver" ed!