ummm whats this?

ummm anybody know what this is? found it on spearoz they reckon the guy ate it lol

Image Upload: 

deepwater's picture

Posts: 1927

Date Joined: 09/05/07

?????

Thu, 2011-06-16 05:50

UUUMMMMMMMMMM ???????   looks like something out of the simpsons

 

                   jeff

Posts: 730

Date Joined: 29/05/08

DEAD

Thu, 2011-06-16 06:55

DEAD

____________________________________________________________________________

"Some  cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever they go." - Oscar Wilde
 

pgreen1's picture

Posts: 395

Date Joined: 20/02/08

WOW Freaky is all i can say

Thu, 2011-06-16 07:04

WOW Freaky is all i can say

Posts: 9358

Date Joined: 21/02/08

F**KING UGLY

Thu, 2011-06-16 07:23

F**KING UGLY

____________________________________________________________________________

Jody's picture

Posts: 1578

Date Joined: 19/04/07

So ....

Thu, 2011-06-16 07:33

 What did it taste like 

____________________________________________________________________________

 TWiZTED

scottland's picture

Posts: 3045

Date Joined: 10/05/10

i would say

Thu, 2011-06-16 07:34

 theres some photoshop involved jmo

____________________________________________________________________________

i support two teams eagles and whoever is playing the dockers

aro_craze's picture

Posts: 11

Date Joined: 19/05/10

 mutated parrot fish?

Thu, 2011-06-16 08:18

 mutated parrot fish?

Posts: 2925

Date Joined: 27/12/06

Ugly

Thu, 2011-06-16 08:26

Cross between a parrot( bird) and a black ass

hlokk's picture

Posts: 4293

Date Joined: 04/04/08

Very interesting that one! 

Thu, 2011-06-16 09:51

Very interesting that one!  Are there any pictures of the other side of it? Having two eyes on one side suggests its some sort of flat bottom fish like a flounder, but the fins definitely dont looks like a flatfish (they look like the fins of a fish that swims vertically to me). The mouth does look like a beak too. Is it like that or just the angle/light?

Considering the fins dont look like a what you'd expect on a bottom hugging fish (like the eyes would suggest), perhaps its just mutated? Otherwise I can imagine it laying on the seafloor like some sort of angler fish :p. Pretty big for a such a highly mutated fish though, so perhaps thats what that species looks like? Will be very interesting to see if anyone knows what it is.

What was it doing when they speared it?

Posts: 119

Date Joined: 13/05/09

na thats the only picture

Thu, 2011-06-16 09:59

na thats the only picture unfortunalty. it was caught on a line not spear so not sure. im thinking photoshop has had a part to play in this lol

MattMiller's picture

Posts: 4171

Date Joined: 15/06/09

C'mon Matt

Thu, 2011-06-16 09:57

it's clearly photoshoped

Posts: 67

Date Joined: 18/04/11

Photoshoped

Thu, 2011-06-16 10:03

If it is Photoshoped they have done a very good job. Attention to the shadows is what I am talking about. I am just not too sure....

madfisher's picture

Posts: 206

Date Joined: 10/10/07

Maybe they caught it near

Thu, 2011-06-16 10:09

Maybe they caught it near Fukushima in Japan???

Posts: 16

Date Joined: 10/02/11

Got a link the the other

Thu, 2011-06-16 11:14

Got a link the the other website?

Posts: 119

Date Joined: 13/05/09

link

Thu, 2011-06-16 12:00

http://spearoz.org/index.php?topic=706.0

apparently caught over east

Posts: 2321

Date Joined: 03/05/06

whatever

Thu, 2011-06-16 11:43

whatever it is, I certainly wouldn't be eating it.

Bodie's picture

Posts: 3758

Date Joined: 05/11/07

definitly photoshoped, can

Thu, 2011-06-16 13:30

definitly photoshoped, can see from the blue around the 2nd eye

fishnut's picture

Posts: 255

Date Joined: 22/09/10

haha - nice photoshop! 

Thu, 2011-06-16 13:46

haha - nice photoshop!  someone with too much time on their hands.  It looks like a female Eastern Blue Groper to me, well except for the head. funny stuff

fishnut's picture

Posts: 255

Date Joined: 22/09/10

This reminded me of another

Thu, 2011-06-16 13:54

This reminded me of another good photoshop job from years ago that some gullible types thought was real...

 

hlokk's picture

Posts: 4293

Date Joined: 04/04/08

Actually, that one wasnt

Thu, 2011-06-16 13:59

Actually, that one wasnt photoshopped, it was a sculpture.

 

Not so convinced the original pic is photoshopped, but theres a few techniques to check it if they havent been careful (e.g. matching the grain). Its clear the second eye isnt just a cut and paste of the other eye though, so was it either taken from another photo or made from scratch or heavily modified from the other one?

fishnut's picture

Posts: 255

Date Joined: 22/09/10

mate, it has a bird's beak!

Thu, 2011-06-16 14:41

mate, it has a bird's beak!

hlokk's picture

Posts: 4293

Date Joined: 04/04/08

So do parrotfish ;)   There

Thu, 2011-06-16 14:48

So do parrotfish ;)   There is still probably a high likelihood it is a photoshop though, just wonder if it definitely is (there are some weird fish out there). The more I look at it the more photoshopped it looks though. If someone could identify the body fish it would give a pretty definitive answer I think. I have a seafishes of southern australia at home, so i'll look in that and see what I find. Or someone with a login check the original site to see if any shenanigans admitted to.

fishnut's picture

Posts: 255

Date Joined: 22/09/10

I did identify it (see above)

Thu, 2011-06-16 15:34

I did identify it (see above) - my money is on a female eastern blue groper.  Those dorsal spines are pretty distinctive.

hlokk's picture

Posts: 4293

Date Joined: 04/04/08

Would have had to photoshop

Thu, 2011-06-16 16:10

Would have had to photoshop the belly profile too though, and if they did that, then could be a much larger number of 'base image' fish. http://australianmuseum.net.au/image/Female-Eastern-Blue-Groper
The shadowing is pretty good if it is though.

If theres something with that distinctive 'bump' on the belly then that would identify it, but if theres nothing at all with that bump, then it could be a number of different 'base fish' though. Def not blue groper eyes, so the eyes would have to be from another fish (as opposed to duplicated) even if the base fish is a blue groper.

smash's picture

Posts: 434

Date Joined: 01/12/10

or maybe from the

Thu, 2011-06-16 14:02

or maybe from the Montebello's....

Dale's picture

Posts: 7930

Date Joined: 13/09/05

It's got a black cockatoo's

Thu, 2011-06-16 14:52

It's got a black cockatoo's beak, or similar

 

Cheers

Dale

____________________________________________________________________________

"Just because you are a Character, Doesn't mean you have Character."

Mr Wolf

 

 

Ringy35's picture

Posts: 138

Date Joined: 30/04/11

Jeeesus.....

Thu, 2011-06-16 19:43

Why would you take it home!!! I wouldnt even touch somethin that come outa the water lookin like that....

joe amato's picture

Posts: 731

Date Joined: 21/12/08

wtf?

Thu, 2011-06-16 20:24

 wtf?bloody scary fish