Fisheries response to Cockburn Sound Fish Kill
Submitted by Jason P on Thu, 2015-12-17 17:53
Letter I recieved in response to complaint made to Fisheries about Cockburn Sound fish kill. My be of interest to some. :)
____________________________________________________________________________
DM306
Laneo
Posts: 101
Date Joined: 05/08/12
I herd the other week csbp
I herd the other week csbp dropped 160t of fertiliser in the sound and the same day by chance fisheries called me so I asked the same question and the guy on the other end said the same so what the F so when are these pricks going to be held accountable
LANEO
Cleo
Posts: 19
Date Joined: 06/12/13
What would you expect. They
What would you expect. They are part of Westfarmers, proft before anything else.
Sam_Wood
Posts: 175
Date Joined: 15/09/15
It's a shame
It's a shame
"Life is Hard, it is even harder if you are stupid,"
Noxious
Posts: 504
Date Joined: 22/12/11
I am an Environmental Advisor
I am an Environmental Advisor for a construction company and one thing I notice very quickly is the language documents use. Non-binding language is often used by consultants that do not want to put their name to a definitive answer, usually when unsure or when the cost of being incorrect is high.
The Cockburn Sound fish kill was MOST LIKELY caused by a bloom of microscopic algae.
To me this is admitting that the cause is not definitively known and is a scape clause if another reason emerges down the track.
rigpig
Posts: 508
Date Joined: 21/11/12
5th paragraph
well pointed out Noxious, as well a in paragraph 5 "generally meets environment guidelines"
rigpig
Posts: 508
Date Joined: 21/11/12
5th paragraph
well pointed out Noxious, as well a in paragraph 5 "generally meets environment guidelines"
Paj man
Posts: 360
Date Joined: 16/09/12
I think it's more the consequences of being incorrect
The consequences of the government being wrong will mean that the trust in any future decisions will drop. From what I've seen on here it already appears pretty low.....
So of course they will be open ended like that - imagine what would happen if a spanner got thrown in the works and it turned out to be something else. "But you told us it was algae?!?! How can we trust the government ever again"
It's all arse covering for present and future. Unless it's 100% certain but with how little we know about marine life, how can you ever be sure?
aka Nick
Brock O
Posts: 3256
Date Joined: 11/01/08
Yes a Shame
for sure.
Always wonder what happens in the back ground with stuff like this, do the agency's doing the investigation know too well who's responsible, and the responsible know too well they are responsible....but between them and state government there's nothing to gain by tackling such a large company.....minor spill unlike to occur on a regular basis... Not enough evidence etc or just too expensive.
I remember an article in western angler years ago were the story was on why we build industrial areas so close to such a precious and special system, all too late now, can only get worse.....but lets hope not.
Perry Home
Posts: 434
Date Joined: 07/10/10
Snapper Guardians
So here's the next question. Would any of the Snapper Guardians who've contributed through public funding want to see the baby snaps released into Cockburn Sound?
Yes it's a shame to see quality Snapper biomass lost such as we've just witnessed. IMO those fish should be put elsewhere. .. not Cockburn.
Redfinman
Posts: 80
Date Joined: 18/10/09
How many members of this web
How many members of this web site are FIFO ? now ask the obvious question = when you are due to fly back to site you are required to attend a medical for D & A testing and most if not all times the result is provided very quickly and you are told fly or no fly. Please explain to me why it took so long to collate and deliver a bulldust answer we all suspect is wrong and NO One is prepared to be honest. Sometime in the not too distant future a very "upset" ex employee from along "the strip" will blow the whistle on the event. The whole smoke and mirrors effect beggers beliefe in the technology driven World we all live in.
I don't work "down the strip" I am not a fisheries scientist I am a lecturer at TAFE I am also very suspicious of the whole events and answers so far. Money talks and profits control events. I feel very sorry for people who make a living from commercial fishing including Al Bevan who have played by every rule in the book to enjoy and protect what we have. In my opinion too little too late by all Government departments almost as if some back ground cover up was happening from the first day fish deaths were reported.
Sorry to see such an incredible resource slowly being destroyed for share holders profits or political gain.
The above comment is my own opinion and in no way reflects the opinions on this web by the site owner or other users.
Meeuwissen
Posts: 755
Date Joined: 29/03/13
+1
Well said redfinman
Down the Line
Catch the Experience
Asahambe
Posts: 154
Date Joined: 14/10/09
Algal Blooms?? Makes u wonder then mmmm
Have a read at what I found on "Algal Blooms" sounds like C/Sound had something completely diffrent in my opinion.
http://sbeta.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/western-cape/red-tide-outbreak-on-garden-route-1960884
http://www.timeslive.co.za/scitech/2015/12/16/Red-tide-hits-popular-Garden-Route-tourist-spots
Born to Fish
Forced to work!
grantarctic1
Posts: 2546
Date Joined: 03/03/11
Yep
From what i have seen , most Diatom blooms are quite visible once they reach dangerous levels.
Can't recall anyone reporting such sightings in the sound before or during the fish kill.
I still say they are full of crap and dont believe the results .