marine parks - hmmm perhaps not

anybody read todays west page 17. looks like the tree hugging comunity are going to have to put up solid examinable facts supporting the need for marine parks if they want to get any joy. Never mind making wild claims about how sanctuaries will fix all the problems of the oceans. if you haven't read it you should it is a good read and sujests things might be about to change for the better as far as rec fishermen go


Posts: 2319

Date Joined: 03/05/06

this?

Mon, 2011-12-19 22:57

New Marine Parks chairman cautious on sanctuary zones

Sanctuary zones where all fishing is banned should be considered sparingly and only if there was overwhelming evidence of their need, according to WA’s new marine parks adviser.  In his first interview as chairman of the Marine Parks and Reserves Authority (MPRA), Tom Hatton said there was potential merit in “no-take” zones but they should not affect anglers unfairly.

Dr Hatton, a marine scientist and director at the CSIRO, indicated that he might also support controversial ideas put forward by recreational fishers opposed to sanctuary zones. These include so-called wilderness fishing areas where recreational fishing was allowed but all other “extractive activities”, such as commercial fishing and oil and gas drilling, were forbidden.

The comments are a significant departure from the position of Dr Hatton’s predecessor, Eric Streitberg, who argued that sanctuary zones were essential if authorities were to protect valuable fish and marine species.

They also raised eyebrows among green groups as the Government thrashes out plans for a series of marine parks in State waters, including the much-touted Camden Sound proposal in the Kimberley.

“There’s enough potential merit in sanctuary zones from place to place that they should be seriously considered, but they need to be based on the best available scientific evidence and an understanding of potential impacts on recreational and commercial fishing and other users”, Dr Hatton said.

Conservation Council of WA executive director Piers Verstegen said the appointments could weaken the resolve of the MPRA to establish marine parks with sanctuary zones, and fears Premier Barnett will not deliver on his significant commitments to marine protection if MPRA appointments were out of step with the latest science and community sentiment.

 

 

Posts: 5981

Date Joined: 17/06/10

marine parks - yes thats it

Tue, 2011-12-20 00:36

yes that the article I was on about

snappermiles's picture

Posts: 2100

Date Joined: 05/11/10

glad to see someone

Tue, 2011-12-20 07:41

is bowing to the greenie pressure! someone who (so Far) seems to know what is going on and how to handle our fisheries

____________________________________________________________________________

ALL FISHERMEN ARE LIARS EXCEPT YOU AND ME! AND IM NOT SO SURE ABOUT YOU!

UncutTriggerInWA's picture

Posts: 2692

Date Joined: 05/09/08

I can smell an election coming

Tue, 2011-12-20 07:53

How can these appointments be "out of step with latest science and community sentiment"????? Dr Hatton is a marine scientist and a Director at the CSIRO. Surely he has the appropriate credentials to assume such a position. Premier Barnett surely can't be criticised for such an appointment. What credentials does Piers Verstegen have to refute such an appointment and question the balanced view put forward by Dr Hatten? Finally we have someone who is not going to be bullied by the greens or the conservation council.

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Vince.
Work smart and fish often.
Member and die-hard supporter of the mighty West Coast Eagles.