Productivity Commission recommends tighter regulation of recreational fishers,

thought we recs would be in the firing line again over licences etc some time into the future
not sure how it would impact in WA as we are already heavily licenced and managed imo
get your head into this below
hezzy

Productivity Commission recommends tighter regulation of recreational fishers, says the sector's been treated with "benign neglect"

ABC Rural By Anna Vidot

Productivity Commission says Australia has treated recreational fishing with "benign neglect", and has recommended that all recreational fishers be licensed in future.

It noted that the recreational catch matches or even exceeds the commercial take for a number of species around the country, and recommended five-yearly surveys of recreational fisheries to get a clearer picture of that.

By contrast, the Commission argued that tighter regulations on commercial fishers were "discouraging innovation" and increasing costs, and should be reformed.

The findings were contained in a draft report, which looked at regulation of Australia's recreational and commercial fishing sectors.

Commissioner Melinda Cilento said the government-ordered review found the impact of recreational fishing on fish stocks hasn't always been clearly understood or regulated.

"We know there are plenty of recreational fishers out there, but there isn't a lot of up to date information on how much fish recreational fishers are catching and where they're catching it from. That sort of information is really important to enabling sustainable management of fish stocks and species," she said.

The report noted that many recreational fishers were already licensed, but recommended that be expanded to all the whole sector nationwide, through a low-cost licensing regime.

"The importance of licensing, for us, is not about raising revenue but about using that as a means to get a better understanding of who's fishing, where are they fishing, what are they catching. It gives us an opportunity to better inform people about the rules and regulations of that," Commissioner Cilento said.

She cited NSW's mulloway and yellow kingfish fisheries, and South Australia's King George whiting fishery, as examples where the recreational take was significant or even exceeds that of commercial fishermen, and noted that recreational fishers have been able to increase their take as scanning technology has improved and boats have grown bigger.

Productivity Commission calls for change to "out of date" commercial fishing regulations

The Productivity Commission argued that the burden of regulations aimed at keeping fisheries sustainable, has fallen more heavily on the commercial sector than on recreational fishers, and that some of those regulations are "out of date".

"They're not enabling commercial fishers to innovate and develop their own best practices, and they're not the best methods available to ensure that catch limits are met," Commissioner Cilento said.

"So, [regulations about] the size of boats, the size of nets, the types of lines, those kinds of things. When you impose restrictions on that, it makes it difficult for fishers to develop new approaches and new methods which might not be consistent with those types of rules, but you're also not targeting what you're interested in, which is the number of fish caught."

Debate over the size of fishing vessels hit the national political agenda in 2012, with the arrival of the supertrawler FV Margiris (subsequently re-named the Abel Tasman) in waters off southern Australia.

Amid community uproar, the then Labor federal government issued a two-year ban on supertrawlers.

The Liberal government made that ban permanent in December 2014, closing Australian fisheries to factory vessels of more than 130 metres in length.

Commissioner Cilento would not be drawn on the manner in which the report's recommendation in favour of loosening commercial fishing restrictions took into account concerns about the environmental impact of that action.

"I think the point to make there is that the report makes clear that Australia's doing a pretty good job in terms of managing its fish stocks, in terms of sustainability and those environmental aims.

"The Fisheries Research and Development Corporation has concluded that 90 per cent of stocks are currently managed sustainably, which is a great outcome. The challenge in the future is to make sure that we can continue to achieve that performance.

"That's why you need best practice regulation, and that's why you need to take into consideration the catch of all sectors [both recreational and commercial]."

More to come.

p://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-31/productivity-commission-regulation-recreational-fishing/7801118

____________________________________________________________________________

OFW 11

evil flourishes when good men do nothing

 


Auslobster's picture

Posts: 1901

Date Joined: 03/05/08

Productivity Commission?

Wed, 2016-08-31 16:20

 What the hell is that? Sounds like another way to keep a bunch of bureaucrats employed.

So licensing everybody is about understanding who is catching and what and how many of what is being caught? Not about raising revenue? But I'm sure there'll be a fee attached to cover "administrative costs".

How, exactly, is licensing going to help with numbers anyway? It's only going to indicate how many people are actually fishing. It's not going to allow for catch and release, nor is it going to allow for the many who go fishing once or twice a year, or for all the times fishers simply catch little or nothing.

All it will do is illustrate how millions of Australians are fishing recreationally and that certainly can't be sustainable, can it?  Simply gives the greenies a wide open shot at us. And the best part is, we get to pay for the privilege!

Posts: 6454

Date Joined: 08/08/11

 Reads like they are gearing

Wed, 2016-08-31 16:28

 Reads like they are gearing up to relax most commercial restrictions (nets etc) so the commercial sector can rape and pillage everything and the rec sector will be regulated out of existance.  I would love to  hear recfishwest's response!

____________________________________________________________________________

Fish! HARD!

carnarvonite's picture

Posts: 8627

Date Joined: 24/07/07

Direct Opposite

Wed, 2016-08-31 18:59

Direct opposite, the bits I have read on commercial sites is that they are copping even more closures over east and can expect that to happen here as well

Posts: 5981

Date Joined: 17/06/10

Hmmm I beg to differ

Wed, 2016-08-31 21:45

Just finished reading the draft report and the way they refer to present regulations "inhibit innovative new ways" and the need to get rid of old restrictions has lit up my warning lights, the very name of the group "productivity commission" has me wondering. I'm not anti pro fishing it's an activity that society needs, it's just that in the past some cowboys have dropped into the industry with the sole intention of making a quick killing and to hell with sustainability or the carnage they leave when they move on.

carnarvonite's picture

Posts: 8627

Date Joined: 24/07/07

Never Again

Thu, 2016-09-01 05:08

With all the changes forced on the industry since I got out some 12 years back there is no way I would contemplate going back to pro fishing.

Hours you can fish, having to register by phone when you leave and return to port, sanctuary zones, transponders on your vessel, catch reports that were voluntary now having to be done inside an hour after unloading, quotas and the list goes on

Posts: 126

Date Joined: 26/08/16

More restrictions on rec fishos?

Thu, 2016-09-01 11:36

 I don't reckon it will be long before recreational fishers will be required to keep and submit logbooks on catches like we had to do with our FTOL.

that way the pencil pushers will be able to keep track of who catches what, where, when and how.

Free research which we will pay to do!

 

fishcrazy's picture

Posts: 1235

Date Joined: 27/01/07

changes

Thu, 2016-09-01 12:46

 Just another bunch of misinformed office jocks that rely on lame surveys(and we all know u can make a survey lean in whatever direction u want) justifying their existence i for one wont be telling them fuck all .remember the red shirts askin questions at the ramp look what that info was used for