Anybody see 60 minutes covering marine sanctuary's tonight?

To me it appeared usual media sensationalism was employed & the only person whom I thought actually provided a valid discussion was given a 10 second time slot. What took place next from a pro fishing perspective was rather embarrassing & quite clearly handpicked to tarnish our reputation.

We need to become more media savvy putting forward more articulate & measured spokespeople before we are crucified. Enough is enough!     


Oracle's picture

Posts: 355

Date Joined: 22/11/10

I just caught then end of it.

Sun, 2011-04-17 20:43

I've just tried searching the net to check out the whole story but doesn't look like it's that easy to view again. Keen to see it if anyone finds it.

DazSamFishing's picture

Posts: 1518

Date Joined: 19/08/09

agree Lamby. It's always the

Sun, 2011-04-17 20:49

agree Lamby. It's always the case. Check out the 60min website, they usually upload the stories within a day or so.

Lamby's picture

Posts: 3145

Date Joined: 04/08/09

Only caught it by accident as

Sun, 2011-04-17 21:01

Only caught it by accident as I think that program anyway has had a remarkable decline from supposed reputable journalism (as good as it possibly can be for mainstream) to a glorified version of today tonight / current affairs sensationalist hack shite. If you catch it Oracle then be prepared to watch it with your head in your hands as I did.   

Posts: 2925

Date Joined: 27/12/06

What a joke

Sun, 2011-04-17 21:31

All of that coming from a former speedboating champ, and she laughs off people going bankrupt. If that sanctuary zone goes ahead from Albany to kalbarri there will be alot more than bankrupt.

Bunny's picture

Posts: 678

Date Joined: 05/08/10

Yeah I saw it. The story was

Mon, 2011-04-18 05:06

Yeah I saw it. The story was definitley presented one sided and they picked people who didn't do us too many favours. I guess at least it was brought into the spotlight, gotta find some postives. The best voice we have is at the voting boothes. At the moment the greens get the ears of the government, we can change that. There's enough of us around to sway the decision makers. We need to protect the environment and the fish stocks but total closures on a wide scale are not the answer.

harro's picture

Posts: 1959

Date Joined: 07/02/08

tripe

Mon, 2011-04-18 07:25

it was absolute bollox,

____________________________________________________________________________

 :::: Bass Hunter ::::

Posts: 26

Date Joined: 09/01/11

when people start screaming

Mon, 2011-04-18 07:59

when people start screaming thier answers like the lady on the story i normally walk away and dont bother listening im envolved in a motorcycle club and that happens at every meeting one woman with powerfull views but there are valid issues on both sides of the fence!

Alan James's picture

Posts: 2234

Date Joined: 30/06/09

Yes it was embarrassing

Mon, 2011-04-18 09:41

I'm sure she had all the best intentions but the non fishing fraternity would view fishos as a bunch of loonies after watching that.  Whilst it is good that it got some air time it is unfortunate that Channel 9 choose to show an unbalanced report.   

____________________________________________________________________________

      

slam's picture

Posts: 168

Date Joined: 09/09/09

Disappointing

Mon, 2011-04-18 10:29

Disappointing to see that we were represented by a wailing banshee & on the other side you had a well informed calm Valerie Taylor putting her point across. Didn't look good at all. Obviously it was one sided & the banshee was picked for her inability to discuss anything in a reasonable decibel level!

Lamby's picture

Posts: 3145

Date Joined: 04/08/09

Bunny I agree with your post

Mon, 2011-04-18 10:43

Bunny I agree with your post mate.

In regards to the fisho's perspective I would have hoped that someone in her group would have pulled her aside to point out that her behaviour was innapropriate & damaging to the cause. In hindsight I am sure the only words her husband mutters are "yes dear"

Always been told that once you start yelling then you have lost everything especially your credibility!

Tony Halliday's picture

Posts: 2500

Date Joined: 14/06/07

mmm where is our peak-body to

Mon, 2011-04-18 10:57

mmm where is our peak-body to send a right of reply to 60minutes?

I think they should be able to get an answer reply back at the 60minutes team, if not go to the other network and let them take ourside of the story....thats how it works in the media!

____________________________________________________________________________

Tony Halliday: ~Meals on Reels ~

 It takes a strong fish to swim against the current. Even a dead one can float with it

"It is always in season for old men to learn." Aeschylus (525-456 BC)

"In a mad world only the mad are sane." Akira Kurosawa (1910-1998)

Posts: 247

Date Joined: 09/03/08

The piece compared us at

Mon, 2011-04-18 11:46

The piece compared us at length to Palau, saying how they had protected the whole of their waters, etc. Clearly misleading and deliberately so.
In fact, I understand Palau's marine park is a whale, mammal and shark sanctuary, and it is mainly commercial fishing closures. Rec fishing is still allowed.

A very poor effort by 60 Minutes, even leaving aside the fact that is was clearly edited to paint fishing in a poor light (screaming woman v softly spoken senior (herself a former spearo!), fishing footage being a wahoo being gaffed in the side and heaved aboard).

Seaquest's picture

Posts: 1132

Date Joined: 22/10/09

Very one sided story which

Mon, 2011-04-18 11:57

Very one sided story which surprises me cause I thought Charles Wooley was a keen flyfisherman.

Posts: 824

Date Joined: 22/07/10

seaquest there is no marine

Mon, 2011-04-18 12:39

seaquest there is no marine parks in the backwaters of the snowy's, he's a trouty.

dkonig82's picture

Posts: 2091

Date Joined: 06/07/10

This is the link if anyone

Mon, 2011-04-18 13:03

This is the link if anyone wants to watch it

http://sixtyminutes.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8237468

 

____________________________________________________________________________

When asked by a non-fisherman 'how many fishing rods do you really need?' the correct answer is either:

n+1 (where n is the number of fishing rods you currently own); or

n-1 (where n is the number of fishing rods which would cause your significant other to dump you. 

dkonig82's picture

Posts: 2091

Date Joined: 06/07/10

The PM over there must be on

Mon, 2011-04-18 13:18

The PM over there must be on a good wicket, seeing that boat.

Wonder if he got that as a gift from conservation groups.

And definitely agree re: the wailing banshee doing more harm than good!

____________________________________________________________________________

When asked by a non-fisherman 'how many fishing rods do you really need?' the correct answer is either:

n+1 (where n is the number of fishing rods you currently own); or

n-1 (where n is the number of fishing rods which would cause your significant other to dump you. 

Posts: 518

Date Joined: 04/05/08

That fat bitch made us look

Mon, 2011-04-18 16:19

That fat bitch made us look like a bunch of idiots...typical

JohnF's picture

Posts: 2839

Date Joined: 07/07/10

jeeze, after listening for 10

Mon, 2011-04-18 22:08

jeeze, after listening for 10 minutes to that rabid fat dugong on 60 minutes, I felt like making the whole of Australia a marine park.....where do they dedge these creatures up from. Unfortunately, there are a lot of redneck fisherman (and rotund loud mouthed fisherwomen it would seem....) who give us all a bad name. It is pretty clear from this site that most of us here want not just a sustainable fishery, but an improved marine ecosystem.

 

As much as it may go against some here, I do think we need more total ban areas but it has got to be carefully determined, and not just half the south west, which is clearly rediculous......I think commercial management is at least as important as recreational.

 

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Boston Whaler 235 Conquest......getting the flogging it was built for.

Lamby's picture

Posts: 3145

Date Joined: 04/08/09

completely agree

Tue, 2011-04-19 07:40

completely agree

dumper's picture

Posts: 1027

Date Joined: 03/04/08

It showed palau locals

Tue, 2011-04-19 01:16

It showed palau locals unloading crates of fish and other guys preparing nets with pro boats in the background. Total no take zone? yeah right, the palau boys must go and rape and pillage other countries fishing areas, like what happens to us over here

iana's picture

Posts: 652

Date Joined: 21/09/09

Shark fishing ban only.

Tue, 2011-04-19 05:16

Had a look at some web sites on Palau, never read anywhere that there were total fishing bans. Looks like asian commercial fihermen go there and catch loads of sharks only to take the fins, and dump the rest, so they have imposed a ban on shark fishing. There maybe a "no fishing" zone around a couple of small islands for a few months of the year, but read nothing else.

Posts: 8

Date Joined: 11/04/11

In days of politics gone mad...

Tue, 2011-04-19 11:26

 

...the media spin will continually be directed to appeal to the masses, get ratings, earn ad revenue, etc.

 

What do they say about facts and a good story again???

Rod P's picture

Posts: 725

Date Joined: 20/05/08

Just watched the and i think

Tue, 2011-04-19 13:02

Just watched the and i think it actually shows passion as well as explaining why the passion on behalf of the fisherman.

I don't think its a very fair attitude from Nine and VT though. The biggest problems facing fishing is not the laws or the amount of fishing areas its IMHO poachers and people who fish outside the law. People who take there limit and them sum. These people need the book thrown at them. Not a pat on the wrist and forced to say sorry.

Secondly is illegal fisheries. This happens so much and is a major reason for large fisheries being over fished. Shark fishing would be fine if the illegal shark finners were stopped. Tuna would be alot better if not for illegal tuna fisheries. Patagonian tooth fish, hell even whaling these are all illegal fisheries that are so big we can plan around them and should be better prepared to stop them.

As for Palau well yes there area is a Protected area. But lets face it 20000 people what are they protecting there waters from Poachers once again. Palau is being poached like no other area in the world. Many conservationists are calling it the last frontier. Paul Watson and Sea Shepherd have been patrolling these waters on behalf of the Palau government for over ten years. They are 100% authorised to stop poachers under on behalf of the Palau government.

So if Valerie Taylor thinks they've got it so right maybe she should look a little deeper.

 

Just my opinion. Better to be heard load then not heard at all.